Computer Interface Movement Using Proximity-Triggered Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for moving computer systems are cumbersome and inefficient, often requiring multiple key presses or keystrokes, wasting user time and device energy, particularly in battery-operated devices.

Innovation Solution

Implementing methods and interfaces that utilize input devices to detect events and criteria for automatically moving or ceasing the movement of computer system components based on user proximity, thereby reducing manual intervention and conserving power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If existing techniques are used to move a computer system, then the system can be moved to various positions, but the process is cumbersome and time-consuming requiring multiple key presses

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveease of moving computer systemVSAvoidtime required to move computer system

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The computer system automatically detects user presence through sensors and self-adjusts its position or configuration without requiring manual user input. The system serves itself by monitoring its environment and making autonomous adjustments to optimize user interaction.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical interaction (physical movement or multiple key presses) with automated sensing and control systems. Sensors detect user presence and trigger automated responses, substituting the need for manual operation with an automated detection-actuation system.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If existing techniques are used to move a computer system, then the system can be repositioned, but it consumes excessive device energy particularly in battery-operated devices

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveautomation of movementVSAvoidenergy consumption during movement

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous operation, the system uses periodic or event-triggered sensing and actuation. The computer system remains in a low-power state until a sensor detects user presence, at which point it activates and makes necessary adjustments, then returns to sleep mode. This periodic operation significantly reduces average energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically determines when movement or adjustment is needed based on sensor input, eliminating the need for continuous user commands or system polling. This self-service approach ensures energy is consumed only when necessary for actual user interaction.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated detection and movement is implemented, then user efficiency is enhanced and cognitive burden is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveuser efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of automated movement system

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs multi-functional components that perform multiple roles. For example, sensors serve both as presence detectors and as triggers for various system adjustments. This universal approach allows automated functionality to be achieved without proportionally increasing overall system complexity, as single components fulfill multiple purposes.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260056603A1User interfaces and techniques for moving a computer system

Publication Date: 2026.02.26 APPLE INC

AI summary

The present disclosure generally relates to user interfaces for a computer system.