Proxy Content for Multi-Source Journal Editing Collaboration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional journalism is slow, expensive, and limited by the need for bulky and expensive editing equipment, and high-definition audio-video content editing is computationally intensive, often requiring powerful computing systems, preventing efficient use on less powerful devices and limiting collaboration.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for integrating multi-source journal content using a multi-source content acquisition engine, selection engine, arrangement engine, and launch engine, enabling real-time editing and collaboration without specialized hardware, utilizing cloud-based resources and proxy content for efficient editing on various devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high-definition audio-video content editing is performed on powerful computing systems, then editing quality and speed are improved, but hardware cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting speedVSAvoidhardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses proxy content as simplified copies of high-definition media files. These proxy versions allow editing operations to be performed on less powerful systems with reduced computational requirements, while the final high-definition output is generated from the original files. This resolves the contradiction by enabling efficient editing workflows on accessible hardware without sacrificing final output quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing step where proxy content serves as a mediator between the original high-definition source and the final output. The proxy content allows editing operations to be performed efficiently on standard hardware, and the results are then applied to the original high-definition files, bridging the gap between computational limitations and quality requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If high-definition audio-video content editing is performed on less powerful computing systems, then hardware accessibility is improved, but editing performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware accessibilityVSAvoidediting performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates proxy content as simplified representations of high-definition media, allowing editors to work with these lighter files on standard hardware. The proxy files maintain sufficient quality for editing decisions while requiring minimal computational resources, thus improving hardware accessibility without completely sacrificing editing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the resolution and quality parameters of the content from high-definition to proxy-quality levels for the editing phase. This parameter reduction makes the content manageable on less powerful systems, and the parameters are restored to high-definition for the final output, resolving the contradiction between accessibility and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple users collaborate on content editing using traditional tools, then collaborative capability is improved, but hardware requirements and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration capabilityVSAvoidsystem requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses proxy content to enable multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously on standard hardware. Each user can access and edit the proxy version of the content without requiring powerful local machines, as the computationally intensive operations are performed on the server side with the original high-definition files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal editing environment where proxy content serves as a common platform for multiple users with diverse hardware capabilities. The same proxy files can be accessed by any standard device, enabling broad collaboration participation without requiring each participant to invest in expensive specialized hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If conventional journalism equipment is used, then content capture capability is improved, but portability and cost decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent capture qualityVSAvoidequipment portability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses proxy content as lightweight copies that can be easily transferred and accessed on portable devices. These proxy files maintain sufficient quality for field editing and review, allowing journalists to work with content captured by various devices without requiring bulky professional equipment for the editing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical requirement for powerful local editing systems with a network-based solution. Instead of relying on locally installed high-performance software and hardware, the system uses cloud-based processing where the server performs the computationally intensive editing operations, allowing journalists to use simple portable devices for content capture and review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12386483B2Multi-source journal content integration systems and methods and systems and methods for collaborative online content editing
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 WEVIDEO
  • US12386483B2 patent drawing
  • US12386483B2 patent drawing
  • US12386483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The paper discloses a system including a multi-source content acquisition engine configured to provide an instruction to launch an editor window to display a set of selectable content from user-generated content generated by a plurality of remote sources and stored in a content datastore. The system includes a multi-source content selection configured to identify a set of selected content from the set of selectable content. The system includes an integrated content arrangement engine configured to arrange the set of selected content into a multi-sourced journal content sequence. The system includes a layer integration engine configured to apply a layer from the layer datastore to a portion of the multi-sourced journal content sequence. The system includes a multi-source content launch engine configured to provide an instruction to display an integrated multi-sourced journal content sequence including the multi-sourced journal content sequence and the layer in the editor window.