Proxy Entity Deterministic Encryption for Secure Cloud Storage Deduplication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cloud storage techniques face challenges in data deduplication over encrypted files, as they compromise data confidentiality and lack fine-grained control for users, while existing solutions are not transparent and inefficient in preventing malicious user abuse.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where a proxy entity generates a master encryption key based on a hash value of the data file, encrypts the file, computes a hash-tree, and uses the top-hash as a file identification (FID) to determine if it's already stored, allowing for secure deduplication and proof-of-ownership procedures to ensure only legitimate files are stored and accessed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If data deduplication is performed on encrypted files, then storage space is reduced, but data confidentiality is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage spaceVSAvoiddata confidentiality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A proxy entity is introduced as an intermediary between the client and cloud storage provider. The proxy generates deterministic encryption keys from file hashes, enabling the cloud provider to perform deduplication on encrypted files without being able to decrypt or read the actual data content, thus maintaining confidentiality while enabling storage optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The encryption key is generated in advance based on the file hash before the actual encryption and storage process. This preliminary key generation enables the cloud provider to identify and deduplicate files based on their cryptographic fingerprints without needing to access or understand the encrypted content, resolving the contradiction between deduplication and confidentiality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If existing deduplication techniques are used, then storage efficiency is improved, but user control and transparency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements proof-of-ownership procedures where clients must verify their ownership of files before deduplication can occur. The proxy entity provides feedback mechanisms including ownership verification, file identification return, and transparent operation status, giving users fine-grained control over their files while maintaining storage efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Clients perform self-verification of file ownership through cryptographic proof mechanisms. The system enables users to autonomously control which files are deduplicated and accessed, with the proxy entity facilitating but not forcing deduplication operations, thus maintaining user control while achieving storage efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If encryption is applied to protect data confidentiality, then data security is improved, but deduplication capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoiddeduplication capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of encryption from random to deterministic, where encryption keys are derived deterministically from file hashes rather than being randomly generated. This parameter change allows identical files to produce identical encrypted versions, enabling deduplication while maintaining strong cryptographic security through the deterministic key derivation function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If proof-of-ownership procedures are implemented, then malicious user abuse is prevented, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Complex manual verification and administrative procedures are replaced with automated cryptographic proof-of-ownership mechanisms. The system uses hash-based deterministic encryption and cryptographic verification to automatically prevent malicious abuse, reducing the need for complex human-mediated security procedures while maintaining high security standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10372918B2Method for storing a data file of a client on a storage entity
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 NEC CORP
  • US10372918B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for storing a data file of a client on a storage entity includes generating, by a proxy entity, a master encryption key; encrypting, by the client, the data file using the master encryption key to produce an encrypted file; computing a hash-tree for the encrypted file and using a top-hash of the hash-tree as a file identification (FID); and determining, by the proxy entity, whether the FID is already known to the storage entity. If the FID is not already known to the storage entity the method further includes computing, by the proxy entity, a top-hash of the encrypted file (PFID), and when the ownership of the data file has been proven, storing the FID being equal with the PFID at the client together with the hash value.