Proxy Nodes in Graph Models for Entity Eligibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for determining entity eligibility for investigatory events are resource-intensive and time-consuming due to the need for comprehensive assessments using entity-attribute filters, often resulting in biased or delayed conclusions due to variations in data reliability and comprehensiveness across entities.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using graph models to selectively employ proxy nodes based on estimated data-reliability metrics, where proxy nodes estimate processing results from other criteria groups, allowing for efficient entity eligibility determination by generating proxy results from entity data sets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive entity-attribute filtering is performed to determine entity eligibility, then measurement precision of entity selection is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to resource-intensive processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity selection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the entity evaluation process into multiple independent criteria groups (e.g., demographic criteria, clinical criteria, laboratory criteria) that can be evaluated separately. Each criteria group is assigned a weight, and entities are evaluated incrementally through these segments rather than requiring complete assessment of all attributes simultaneously, thus improving processing speed while maintaining selection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by allowing entity eligibility determination to proceed with incomplete attribute data. Entities can be partially evaluated based on available criteria groups, and the system continues processing without waiting for complete data collection, thereby significantly improving productivity while using confidence scores to maintain measurement precision for final eligibility decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If complete entity attribute assessment is performed for each entity, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresult characterization accuracyVSAvoidinvestigatory event conclusion time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining and weighting multiple criteria groups before entity assessment begins. The system prepares the evaluation framework in advance, organizing criteria into hierarchical groups with assigned weights, so that when entities are assessed, the evaluation can proceed efficiently through predetermined pathways rather than requiring ad hoc analysis, thus reducing time loss while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by making the evaluation process adaptive and incremental. Entities are assessed dynamically as attributes become available, with the system adjusting processing based on confidence scores and data completeness. This dynamic approach allows early termination for clearly eligible or ineligible entities and continues detailed assessment only where needed, reducing overall time loss while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If data with varying reliability is used across entities, then adaptability is improved, but reliability of conclusions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata source flexibilityVSAvoidconclusion reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different weights to different criteria groups based on their reliability and importance. Not all criteria are treated equally; instead, each criteria group receives a weight reflecting its contribution to reliable conclusion formation. This allows the system to adapt to varying data quality across different attribute types while maintaining overall conclusion reliability through weighted aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by introducing confidence scores and weight parameters that adjust the influence of different data sources. When data reliability varies across entities or attribute types, the system modifies parameters such as criterion weights and confidence thresholds to compensate, thereby maintaining conclusion reliability while preserving adaptability to diverse data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If proxy nodes are selectively used based on data-reliability metrics, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentity eligibility determination speedVSAvoidgraph model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the graph model into distinct node types (criteria nodes, entity nodes, proxy nodes) and connection types, making the complexity manageable through structured organization. Proxy nodes are selectively introduced only where data reliability metrics indicate their usefulness, rather than throughout the entire model, thus improving productivity while controlling device complexity through targeted application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces proxy nodes as intermediary elements that mediate between entity attributes and criteria evaluation when direct data is unreliable or unavailable. These proxy nodes serve as intermediate computational steps that can infer or substitute missing information, improving productivity by enabling continued processing while the added complexity is localized to specific intermediary connections rather than the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12079281B2Techniques for integrating proxy nodes into graph-model-based investigatory-event mappings
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 GENOSPACE LLC
  • US12079281B2 patent drawing
  • US12079281B2 patent drawing
  • US12079281B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems disclosed herein relate generally to generating and using graph models to perform entity-specific mappings to investigatory events. More specifically, data-reliability metrics are used to selectively use proxy nodes in graph-model trajectories during generation of the mappings.