Proxy Protocol Response for Image Printer Power Saving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image forming systems cannot shift to a power-saving state while performing service discovery protocols, as they need to maintain continuous electricity to respond to search commands, leading to increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A management system that designates one image processing apparatus as an in-charge device for each protocol, allowing it to respond to multicast packets on behalf of others, while other apparatuses refrain from responding, enabling power-saving mode without compromising service availability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If image processing apparatuses continuously respond to service discovery protocol packets, then service availability is maintained, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice availabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple image processing apparatuses merge their protocol response functions by designating one apparatus as the in-charge device that responds to multicast packets on behalf of all apparatuses. This combines the response functionality of multiple devices into a single active response source, allowing other apparatuses to enter power-saving states while maintaining service availability through the proxy response mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The in-charge device acts as an intermediary or proxy that receives multicast packets and generates response packets on behalf of other image processing apparatuses. This intermediary mechanism allows non-in-charge apparatuses to remain inactive (in power-saving mode) while still being discoverable through the proxy's responses, thus resolving the contradiction between service availability and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If image processing apparatuses enter power-saving state, then power consumption is reduced, but ability to respond to search commands deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidresponse capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The in-charge device performs self-service by continuously monitoring for multicast packets and generating responses on behalf of other apparatuses. This self-service mechanism allows the system to maintain response capability without requiring all apparatuses to remain active, as the in-charge device independently handles the protocol communication while other apparatuses save power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The in-charge device assumes multiple functions: it responds to service discovery protocol packets, represents other apparatuses in the network, and enables power-saving operation for non-in-charge devices. This multi-functionality consolidates response capability into a single apparatus while allowing others to enter power-saving states, resolving the contradiction between power consumption and response capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9606757B2Management system, image processing apparatus, non-transitory computer-readable recording medium encoded with protocol sharing program, and protocol sharing method
Publication Date: 2017.03.28 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US9606757B2 patent drawing
  • US9606757B2 patent drawing
  • US9606757B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller of a management device managing a plurality of image processing apparatuses acquires ability information and device identification information from the respective image processing apparatuses; determines, based on the ability information of the respective image processing apparatuses, as an in-charge device any one of the respective image processing apparatuses for each of a plurality of protocols predetermined; for the respective protocols, causes the in-charge device determined for the protocol to respond to a packet by multicast of the protocol on behalf of the respective image processing apparatuses; and causes one or more image processing apparatuses other than the in-charge device determined for the protocol to refrain from responding to a packet by multicast of the protocol. The respective image processing apparatuses respond to a packet by multicast of the protocol if the apparatus itself is determined the in-charge device for the protocol.