Proxy Voting Interface with Multilingual Translation Database

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic voting systems and methods for institutional proxies face challenges in managing meeting notifications, voting, tracking, mailing, reporting, and record keeping, particularly for thousands of publicly traded securities, and lack the ability to provide information in a user's preferred language, complicating compliance with SEC regulations.

Innovation Solution

A system that integrates, organizes, and displays information in a user's preferred language through a website, allowing voting entities to cast votes electronically, with automated interfaces for SEC compliant reporting and record keeping, using message tokens and a translation database to tailor language presentation based on user preference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If electronic voting systems are implemented for institutional proxies, then voting and reporting processes are automated, but the systems fail to provide information in users' preferred languages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoting and reporting automationVSAvoidlanguage preference accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting user language preferences in advance and preparing translated interface elements before the user interacts with the system. The translation database is pre-populated with multilingual content, allowing the system to automatically serve users in their preferred language without real-time translation delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A translation database acts as an intermediary between the core voting system and users with different language preferences. This intermediary layer translates interface elements and information without affecting the underlying automated voting processes, thereby maintaining automation while adding language adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive meeting notification and voting tracking systems are implemented, then SEC compliance is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSEC complianceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multi-functional components that handle multiple compliance requirements simultaneously. For example, the notification system automatically manages meeting notifications, voting tracking, and record-keeping in a unified manner, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive SEC compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically generating compliance reports, tracking voting records, and maintaining necessary documentation without requiring manual intervention. This automation of compliance functions reduces operational complexity while ensuring reliable SEC adherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If multilingual interface support is added to the voting system, then user experience is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidinterface processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system detects user language preferences in advance and pre-loads appropriate interface elements in the user's preferred language. This preliminary action eliminates real-time translation delays during user interaction, maintaining fast interface response times while providing multilingual support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies language translation locally to each user's interface based on their detected preference, rather than translating all content for all users. This localized approach optimizes processing efficiency by only translating necessary interface elements for individual users, minimizing processing time overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20230334269A1Methods and systems configured for processing interface elements
Publication Date: 2023.10.19 BROADRIDGE INVESTOR COMM SOLUTIONS
  • US20230334269A1 patent drawing
  • US20230334269A1 patent drawing
  • US20230334269A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of the present invention relates to electronic voting methods and systems that help simplify the management of institutional proxies. In one example, the methods and systems manage the process of meeting notifications, voting, tracking, mailing, reporting, record maintenance and/or vote disclosure rules enacted by the SEC. In one specific example, this may be done for thousands of publicly traded securities custodied at various banks, brokers and global custodians. In another example, a system (and corresponding method) may be provided for integrating, organizing and displaying (e.g., via a website) information in a language of preference for each user of the system. The information may comprise meeting, agenda and/or ballot information and the users of the system/method may be voting entities empowered to cast votes via the system.