Pruning Shears Drive Mechanism for Stroke and Force Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pruning shears require the same length of pull stroke for cutting both thin twigs and thick branches, leading to excessive work when cutting multiple thin twigs and increased force when attempting to reduce mechanical advantage for shorter strokes.

Innovation Solution

The pruning shears feature a drive mechanism with two mechanical advantages: a small advantage for cutting without resistance and an automatic toggle to a larger advantage when encountering a branch, allowing for a short stroke with minimal force and a longer stroke with increased cutting power.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If the mechanical advantage of the drive mechanism is made smaller to provide a shorter length of stroke, then the stroke distance is reduced, but more force is needed for cutting the branch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestroke distanceVSAvoidcutting force
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The drive mechanism dynamically changes its mechanical advantage ratio based on operating conditions. During the approach phase (no cutting resistance), the mechanism operates in a first state with smaller mechanical advantage for rapid blade movement and short stroke. When cutting resistance is detected, the mechanism automatically toggles to a second state with larger mechanical advantage to provide increased cutting force. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing the system to optimize for either stroke distance or cutting force depending on the immediate operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If the mechanical advantage of the drive mechanism is made larger to provide more cutting power, then the cutting force is increased, but the length of stroke becomes longer causing excess work

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting forceVSAvoidstroke distance
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The drive mechanism employs dynamic state switching to adapt the mechanical advantage ratio to operational requirements. When cutting resistance is detected (branch contact), the mechanism automatically transitions to a second state with larger mechanical advantage, providing the necessary cutting force. During non-cutting phases (approach and return), the mechanism operates in a first state with smaller mechanical advantage, minimizing stroke distance and avoiding excess work. This dynamic adjustment eliminates the need to continuously operate with high mechanical advantage, thereby reducing unnecessary work while maintaining cutting power when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the same length of pull stroke is used for both thin twigs and thick branches, then the device is simple to operate, but excessive work is needed when cutting multiple thin twigs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidexcess work
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The drive mechanism incorporates automatic detection and self-adjustment capabilities. A detection device monitors whether the blade is encountering cutting resistance (branch contact) or moving freely (approach phase). Based on this automatic detection, the control system self-adjusts the mechanical advantage ratio without requiring user intervention. This self-service approach maintains ease of operation while optimizing energy efficiency, as the mechanism automatically selects the appropriate mechanical advantage state based on real-time operational conditions, eliminating excess work during non-cutting phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design optimizes user movement by avoiding long idle strokes when cutting thin branches and providing enhanced cutting power when needed, improving efficiency and comfort during pruning tasks.

Implementation Method 1

the first pulley (321) rotatable relative to the drive mechanism (300) about an axis (325) and coupled to the blade (201)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 2

a second pulley (322) rotatable relative to the drive mechanism (300) about the axis (325) and arranged to receive the driving line (311) at least party around the second pulley (322)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Implementation Method 3

the driving line (311) is arranged to transmit forces between the first pulley (321), the second pulley (322) and the sheave (323)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Implementation Method 4

a spring-biased blade (201) pivotally connected to a jaw (202) about a pivot point (205), the jaw (202) cooperating with the blade (201) to sever a workpiece received in a bight (203) formed by the jaw (202); the spring-biased blade (201) being biased with a blade force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3155891B1Pruning shears
Publication Date: 2020.11.25 FISKARS FINLAND OY AB
  • EP3155891B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3155891B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3155891B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to pruning shears (100) comprising cutting head (200) with a spring-biased blade (201) pivotally connected to a jaw (202) arranged to sever a workpiece received in a bight (203) formed by the jaw (202). A drive mechanism (300) is connected to the cutting head (200) and an elongate housing (400) is connected to the drive mechanism (300). The drive mechanism (300) comprises a rotation prevention means for preventing rotation of a second pulley in relation to the drive mechanism (300) when a drawing torque is applied to the second pulley, wherein the drawing torque is greater than a threshold torque, resulting in a second pulley being stationary in relation to the drive mechanism (300) and the first pulley rotating in relation to the drive mechanism (300).