Blowdown Gas Flow Regulation in PSA Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pressure and flow rate fluctuations in the tail gas from adsorption units in PSA processes pose challenges for maintaining steady furnace operations, leading to inefficiencies and the need for larger surge vessels, which are costly.

Innovation Solution

A process that regulates the flow rate of the blowdown gas by sensing pressure and flow rate fluctuations in the tail gas, adjusting the flow rate of the blowdown gas to maintain target limits, thereby reducing the size of the surge vessel required and optimizing PSA unit efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If no flow rate regulation is applied to blowdown gas, then the PSA process operates with simple control, but the tail gas flow rate fluctuates significantly causing furnace operation instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefurnace operation stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where a flow sensor monitors the actual flow rate of tail gas and a controller adjusts the blowdown gas flow rate through a control valve to maintain stable tail gas flow. This closed-loop feedback mechanism directly addresses the reliability issue by automatically compensating for flow fluctuations, while the controller and sensor add controlled complexity only where needed for stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a control valve as an intermediary device between the blowdown gas source and the tail gas stream. This intermediary component enables precise regulation of blowdown gas flow rate, acting as a mediator that translates control signals into actual flow adjustments, thereby stabilizing tail gas flow without requiring direct modification of the entire PSA system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a large surge vessel is used to dampen tail gas flow fluctuations, then furnace operation stability is maintained, but capital costs increase due to larger equipment requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefurnace operation stabilityVSAvoidsurge vessel size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system actively manages tail gas flow fluctuations in real-time, eliminating the need for oversized surge vessels. By continuously monitoring and adjusting blowdown gas flow rate, the system maintains stable tail gas flow with minimal surge capacity, directly reducing the volume and capital cost of surge vessel requirements while preserving furnace operation stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the passive mechanical solution of large surge vessels with an active control system using sensors, controllers, and control valves. This substitution transitions from a bulk mechanical approach (large vessels) to a precise control approach, reducing equipment volume while achieving the same stability outcome through intelligent regulation of blowdown gas flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Volume of stationary object

If the flow rate of blowdown gas is regulated to maintain target tail gas flow, then surge vessel size is reduced, but the complexity of flow sensing and control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurge vessel sizeVSAvoidflow control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback control where a flow sensor measures actual tail gas flow rate and feeds this information to a controller that adjusts the blowdown gas control valve. This feedback mechanism enables precise surge vessel size reduction through automated flow regulation, with the control complexity concentrated in a dedicated control module rather than distributed throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed to be self-regulating, automatically adjusting blowdown gas flow based on real-time tail gas flow measurements without requiring external intervention. The controller and sensor work together in a self-service manner to maintain target flow rates, minimizing the need for additional complex control infrastructure while achieving surge vessel size reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the size of the surge vessel needed, improves efficiency, and allows for lower final blowdown pressures and purge pressures, enhancing overall PSA unit performance and reducing capital costs.

Implementation Method 1

a production step (110), which comprises introducing a stream (101) of the feed gas mixture (100) into an adsorption bed undergoing the production step (110) and adsorbing the secondary gas components on the adsorbent in the adsorption bed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11167240B2Reducing fluctuations in tail gas flow from an adsorption unit
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 AIR PROD & CHEM INC
  • US11167240B2 patent drawing
  • US11167240B2 patent drawing
  • US11167240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Pressure swing adsorption process for reducing fluctuations in the flow rate of tail gas from the adsorption unit. The flow rate of the stream of blowdown gas is regulated responsive signals from a sensor measuring the pressure and/or flow rate of the tail gas comprising the blowdown gas and purge gas effluent before the tail gas is introduced into a surge vessel.