PSA Apparatus Cycle Optimization for Compact Gas Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) methods for separating target gases like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide from gas mixtures require large apparatus due to long cycle times, which can lead to inefficient use of adsorbent and increased size, and the decompression process using vacuum pumps is time-consuming, potentially reducing separation performance.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing three adsorption columns where the adsorption step is continuously performed in one column while the desorption step is extended in the other two columns, allowing for parallel operation and shorter cycle times, with a two-stage desorption process using different depressurization methods to ensure efficient gas separation without compromising purity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of stationary object

If the cycle time is shortened to make the PSA apparatus compact, then the apparatus size is reduced, but the desorption time becomes insufficient and separation performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus sizeVSAvoidseparation performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The desorption step is divided into two distinct stages: a first desorption step and a second desorption step. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently - the first stage can focus on rapid pressure reduction to remove adsorbed gas, while the second stage can focus on maintaining low pressure for sufficient desorption time, thereby achieving both compact apparatus size and high separation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action through the two-stage desorption process within each PSA cycle. The first desorption step performs rapid decompression, followed by a second desorption step that maintains low pressure for an extended period. This periodic structure ensures that within the shortened overall cycle time, there are distinct phases optimized for different desorption requirements, preventing performance deterioration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Volume of stationary object

If the adsorption time is shortened to reduce apparatus size, then the apparatus becomes more compact, but the breakthrough time of the adsorbent decreases and less adsorbent can be loaded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus sizeVSAvoidgas processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the adsorption and desorption times unequal, with the desorption time (particularly the second desorption step) being longer than the adsorption time. This dynamic time allocation allows the system to process larger gas volumes efficiently - the shortened adsorption time reduces the required adsorbent bed size, while the extended desorption time ensures complete regeneration, thereby increasing overall productivity without sacrificing compactness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the decompression time is extended to ensure high-purity target gas separation, then the separation performance is improved, but the cycle time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation performanceVSAvoidgas processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The decompression process is segmented into two distinct steps with different functions. The first desorption step performs rapid pressure reduction to remove the majority of adsorbed target gas, while the second desorption step maintains low pressure for a longer duration to ensure complete desorption and high purity. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high separation performance without extending the total cycle time excessively, as each segment is optimized for its specific purpose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2719437B1Target gas separation method
Publication Date: 2019.12.04 SUMITOMO SEIKA CHEM CO LTD
  • EP2719437B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2719437B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2719437B1 patent drawingFigure 3(a)~3(f)

AI summary

A method for separating a target gas from a gas mixture is performed by using at least three adsorption columns containing an adsorbent. In this method, in each of the adsorption columns, a cycle is repeated which includes an adsorption step of introducing the gas mixture into the adsorption column to adsorb the target gas in the gas mixture to the adsorbent while discharging non-adsorbed gas from the adsorption column, a rinsing step of introducing rinsing gas into the adsorption column to discharge rinsing off-gas from the adsorption column, and a desorption step of reducing the pressure inside the adsorption column to desorb the target gas from the adsorbent and discharging the desorbed gas from the adsorption column. The adsorption step is constantly performed in any one of the adsorption columns throughout the cycle. The desorption time for performing the desorption step is made longer than adsorption time for performing the adsorption step.