Pressure Swing Adsorption Phase Time Regulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

PSA units operating under non-nominal conditions are oversized, leading to reduced hydrogen production and increased specific costs due to inefficient regulation of pressure cycles, which fails to maintain optimal purity and yield.

Innovation Solution

A pressure modulated adsorption process that adjusts pressure cycle phases to maintain the phase time within ±5% of nominal conditions by modifying pressures between high and low cycle pressures, optimizing the quantity and quality of elution gas to enhance extraction yield and reduce feed gas requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If PSA units operate under non-nominal conditions with traditional regulation, then the unit is oversized, but hydrogen production decreases and specific costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation under varying conditionsVSAvoidhydrogen production
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the pressure cycle parameters adjustable and adaptive to operating conditions. The phase time is dynamically regulated to remain within ±5% of nominal values by modifying pressures between high and low cycle pressures, allowing the PSA unit to optimize performance across varying feed flow rates and compositions rather than operating in a fixed, oversized configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by specifically adjusting pressure parameters (pressures between high and low cycle pressures) to maintain optimal phase time. This allows the system to adapt to non-nominal operating conditions while preserving hydrogen production efficiency and reducing specific costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If PSA units operate under non-nominal conditions with traditional regulation, then the unit is oversized, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation under varying conditionsVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic regulation of phase time through pressure modification enables the system to operate efficiently at varying load conditions, avoiding the energy waste associated with oversized units running at partial capacity. This maintains optimal thermodynamic conditions across different operating scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing pressure parameters to maintain nominal phase time, the system optimizes energy utilization and reduces operational costs under non-nominal conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If pressure cycle parameters are not adjusted under non-nominal conditions, then operation is simple, but purity and yield optimization is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidpurity and yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by regulating phase time based on operating conditions. The system monitors and adjusts pressure parameters to maintain phase time within ±5% of nominal values, automatically optimizing purity and yield without requiring complex manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automatic adjustment of pressure parameters maintains both operational simplicity and manufacturing precision through controlled parameter modification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases hydrogen production efficiency, reduces the quantity of feed gas needed, and lowers operational costs by optimizing the PSA unit's performance under varying operating conditions while maintaining product purity.

Implementation Method 1

a) adsorption at the high pressure of the cycle with production of the gas flow enriched in compound X

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

PSA units are commonly used for the separation and/or purification of feed gases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure Swing Adsorption: Pressure Swing Adsorption

Data Source

PatentEP3052217B1Method of pressure swing adsorption with regulation
Publication Date: 2021.06.16 LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
  • EP3052217B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3052217B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3052217B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) for producing a gas stream enriched in a compound X from a feed gas stream, implementing at least 2 adsorbers, each adsorber being subjected to a pressure cycle having a high pressure and a low pressure and comprising the following successive steps: a) adsorption at the high pressure of the cycle, producing the gas stream enriched in compound X, b) depressurisation to the low pressure of the cycle, producing at least a part of an elution gas, c) elution at the low pressure by means of the elution gas, d) repressurisation to the high pressure, characterised in that: the pressure cycle has a phase time corresponding to the duration of a pressure cycle divided by the number of adsorbers, and the pressure of the pressure cycle located between the high pressure and the low pressure of the pressure cycle is modified so as to keep the phase time of the PSA equal to or within ± 5% of the nominal phase time, corresponding to the phase time of the PSA in design conditions, during at least a part of the range of variation of the operating conditions.