PSA Process Phase Time Shift for Valve Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) processes face limitations in achieving high performance and reducing investment costs, particularly in hydrogen production, due to the complexity of synchronizing multiple adsorber stages and the difficulty in optimizing balancing steps, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased valve costs.

Innovation Solution

A PSA process using N adsorbers with a pressure cycle where each adsorber follows a phase time shift, with only one active step per phase time, incorporating a series of active steps including adsorption, equilibration, purge, and repressurization, and utilizing a set of valves and distributors to control gas flow, allowing for longer phase times and reduced adsorber size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple adsorber stages are synchronized with multiple active steps per phase time, then productivity and separation performance are improved, but device complexity and valve synchronization requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas production rateVSAvoidvalve synchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PSA cycle is divided into distinct phase times, with each adsorber undergoing a specific active step during each phase time. This segmentation allows for simplified control logic where each adsorber follows a predetermined sequence of steps, reducing the complexity of synchronizing multiple adsorbers while maintaining high productivity through continuous operation of multiple units in different cycle phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If balancing steps are optimized with multiple equilibration steps, then separation precision is improved, but manufacturing cost and valve complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas separation precisionVSAvoidvalve and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The balancing operation is performed periodically at specific phase times during the PSA cycle, with adsorbers transitioning through equilibration steps at regular intervals. This periodic execution of balancing steps ensures consistent gas separation precision while using simple, repeatable control sequences that reduce valve and control system complexity compared to continuous or dynamically adjusted balancing approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Manufacturing precision

If phase time is extended to allow complete balancing steps, then separation performance is improved, but loss of time for production increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadsorbate separation precisionVSAvoidnon-production time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

While one adsorber undergoes balancing steps during a phase time, other adsorbers are simultaneously performing productive adsorption or other cycle steps. This continuous operation across multiple adsorbers ensures that the system maintains high overall productivity while individual units have sufficient time to complete their balancing steps for optimal separation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of manufacture

If adsorber size is reduced for easier transport and installation, then ease of manufacture is improved, but productivity per unit decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport and installation easeVSAvoidgas production per adsorber
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The overall PSA system is segmented into multiple smaller adsorber units rather than using fewer large adsorbers. Each small adsorber is easier to transport and install, but the collective productivity of all adsorbers in parallel achieves the required total gas production rate, effectively distributing the productivity requirement across multiple compact units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables higher performance and reduced investment costs by maintaining stable production and minimizing valve size and complexity, while allowing for flexible cycle adjustments and easier transport and installation of smaller adsorbers.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit is used... exploiting the difference in affinity of one or more adsorbents for the different constituent molecules of the mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

the adsorbent at the end of the production phase is regenerated by desorption of impurities achieved through a reduction in their partial pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Data Source

PatentEP2878356B1Psa process with an active step during each time phase
Publication Date: 2019.08.14 LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE
  • EP2878356B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Pressure-modulated adsorption (PSA) process for producing a gas stream enriched in compound X from a feed gas stream, employing N adsorbers with N ≥5, each adsorber being subjected to a pressure cycle having: - a phase time corresponding to the duration of the pressure cycle divided by the number of adsorbers, and - a series of active steps characterized in that: - each adsorber n follows the pressure cycle with a phase time offset from the pressure cycle of adsorber n-1 with n ≤ N, and - during each phase time only an active step or part of an active step takes place.