PSA Purification for Syngas Dehydration and CO2 Removal

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional processes for removing water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) from multicomponent gas mixtures, such as syngas and natural gas, are costly and complex, often requiring multiple units and resulting in ineffective heat transfer and safety risks due to solid contamination in cryogenic separation units.

Innovation Solution

A cyclic pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process using adsorbent beds with specific CO2 loading and differential capacity characteristics, subjected to a series of pressure equalization, blowdown, purge, and repressurization steps, to achieve substantial removal of H2O and CO2 while maintaining high recovery of product gas components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cryogenic separation processes are used to remove H2O and CO2 from multicomponent gas, then purification is achieved, but capital cost and process complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes H2O and CO2 from the multicomponent feed gas using a dedicated PSA unit with specific adsorbent beds, separating the purification function from the cryogenic separation process. This extraction approach eliminates the need for complex pre-purification trains while maintaining effective removal of contaminants that would cause freeze-up in cryogenic units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The PSA unit performs multiple functions simultaneously: removing H2O, removing CO2, and protecting the cryogenic separation unit from freeze-up conditions. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate purification units, reducing overall process complexity while maintaining purification effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple process units are used for sequential removal of H2O and CO2, then purification is achieved, but capital cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the removal of H2O and CO2 into a single PSA process unit with multi-layer adsorbent beds, rather than using sequential separate units. The adsorbent bed configuration combines different adsorbent materials (hydrophilic layer for H2O, CO2-selective layer for CO2) in one integrated system, achieving effective removal of both contaminants while reducing capital cost compared to multiple separate units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If trace levels of H2O and CO2 are not removed, then process simplicity is maintained, but freeze-up occurs in cryogenic units causing shutdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The PSA unit performs preliminary removal of H2O and CO2 to trace levels before the gas enters the cryogenic separation unit. This preliminary action prevents the formation of hydrates and solids that would cause freeze-up and shutdowns in the cryogenic unit, ensuring operational continuity while maintaining process simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies preliminary anti-action by removing contaminants that would otherwise cause harmful freeze-up conditions in the cryogenic unit. The PSA unit preemptively eliminates H2O and CO2 to levels below those that would form solids at cryogenic temperatures, preventing the freeze-up problem before it can occur in the downstream cryogenic separation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Reliability

If conventional adsorbents are used in PSA process, then CO2 removal is achieved, but product gas recovery decreases due to adsorption of valuable components

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by using different adsorbent materials in different layers of the adsorbent bed. The hydrophilic layer (first layer) specifically targets H2O removal, while the CO2-selective layer (second layer) specifically targets CO2 removal. This localized functionality in different bed sections allows selective removal of contaminants while minimizing adsorption of valuable product gas components, maintaining high recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses porous adsorbent materials with specific pore structures and chemistries tailored for selective contaminant removal. The hydrophilic porous material in the first layer preferentially adsorbs water molecules, while the CO2-selective porous material in the second layer preferentially adsorbs CO2. These specialized porous materials achieve effective contaminant removal while allowing valuable product gases to pass through with minimal adsorption, maintaining high recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The PSA process effectively produces a multicomponent product gas substantially free of H2O and CO2 with high recovery of product gas components, reducing capital and energy costs by simplifying the process and minimizing solid contamination, thus enhancing operational safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

contacting a multicomponent feed gas at elevated pressure with an adsorbent bed to obtain a multicomponent product gas substantially free of H2O and CO2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

three or more pressure equalization steps at decreasing pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure equalization:

Implementation Method 3

a blowdown step

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepressurisation: Depressurisation

Implementation Method 4

a purge step in which the purge gas includes a portion of the product gas or a gas originating externally from the process that is substantially free of H2O and CO2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPurge:

Implementation Method 5

a final repressurization step

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurisation: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS20230338886A1High recovery process for purification of multicomponent gases
Publication Date: 2023.10.26
  • US20230338886A1 patent drawing
  • US20230338886A1 patent drawing
  • US20230338886A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The process of the present invention provides high recovery and low capital cost giving it an economic advantage over previously known purification processes. The present process has particular applicability to the purification of synthesis gases comprising at least hydrogen (H2), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), CO2, and H2O to obtain a gas stream including at least H2, CO, and CH4, that is substantially free of H2O and CO2. The process also has applicability to the purification of natural gases inclusive of at least CH4, N2, CO2, and H2O to produce a gas stream including at least CH4 and N2, but which is substantially free of H2O and CO2.