Pseudo Defect Image Generation for Printing Error Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image inspection techniques for printed matter lack accuracy in determining the acceptability of printing errors, as they rely on fixed thresholds and do not effectively handle defects occurring in different areas of an image, leading to potential misclassification and quality issues.

Innovation Solution

An image inspecting apparatus that compares scanned image data with sample image data to detect printing errors and generates pseudo defect images at different locations, allowing users to determine acceptability and adjust detection thresholds accordingly, enhancing accuracy and user control over image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fixed threshold comparison is used to detect printing errors, then the inspection process is simple and fast, but the accuracy of acceptability determination deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection speedVSAvoidacceptability determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the fixed threshold inspection method into a dynamic one by generating pseudo defect images at multiple positions and allowing users to interactively adjust detection thresholds. The system dynamically adapts the inspection criteria based on user feedback and the specific characteristics of detected defects, thereby improving accuracy without significantly reducing inspection speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where users review pseudo defect images and provide feedback on defect acceptability. This feedback is used to adjust the detection thresholds and inspection criteria, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves the accuracy of acceptability determination while maintaining efficient inspection throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If printing errors are detected using fixed thresholds, then the inspection process is straightforward, but the ability to handle defects in different image areas deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection process complexityVSAvoidhandling of defects in different areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by generating pseudo defect images at multiple specific positions within the scanned image and allowing users to evaluate defects in different areas separately. The system can adjust detection criteria locally for different regions of the image, enabling tailored inspection standards for various areas while maintaining an otherwise straightforward inspection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the inspection process into multiple stages: initial automatic detection using fixed thresholds, generation of pseudo defect images at different positions, user review and evaluation, and threshold adjustment. This segmentation allows the system to maintain simplicity in the automated portion while adding complexity only where needed for handling different defect areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If pseudo defect images are generated at different positions, then the accuracy of acceptability determination improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceptability determination accuracyVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by creating pseudo defect images that replicate the appearance of actual printing errors at different positions. These copied defect images allow users to evaluate the acceptability of defects without processing the entire original scanned image repeatedly, reducing the computational complexity while maintaining high accuracy in acceptability determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-generating pseudo defect images at multiple positions before the final acceptability determination. This preliminary generation of test images allows the system to prepare multiple evaluation scenarios in advance, reducing the complexity of real-time processing while improving the accuracy of the final determination through comprehensive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11303762B2Image inspecting apparatus, display method, and computer product displaying pseudo defect image at position different from printing error
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 RICOH CO LTD
  • US11303762B2 patent drawing
  • US11303762B2 patent drawing
  • US11303762B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image inspecting apparatus includes circuitry. The circuitry is configured to determine, based on a result of comparison of scanned image data and sample image data, whether an image indicated by the scanned image data has a printing error, the scanned image data being generated from a document image formed and output according to document image data on a recording medium and read, the sample image data corresponding to the document image data. The circuitry is configured to generate display image data representing a pseudo defect image having the printing error added to a position different from a position of the printing error in the image indicated by the scanned image data, in response to determination that the image indicated by the scanned image data has the printing error.