Patient-Specific Implant Modeling From STL Trace Lines and Screw Holes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current patient-specific implant (PSI) design practices are time-consuming and require advanced engineering skills, leading to inefficiencies and potential miscommunication between surgeons and engineers during the CAD process for jaw resection and reconstruction.

Innovation Solution

A novel algorithm streamlines the CAD process by automating steps such as trace line processing, generating and transforming rectangles, and incorporating screw holes, using cubic-spline data interpolation and smoothing techniques to create a patient-specific implant model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual CAD commands and Boolean operations are used to model patient-specific implants, then design flexibility and customization are achieved, but the design process becomes time-consuming and requires advanced engineering skills

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign customizationVSAvoiddesign process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables surgeons to directly create and modify implant designs using intuitive sketching tools without requiring engineering intermediaries. The automated algorithms process the surgeon's sketches and generate complete implant models, allowing the end-user (surgeon) to perform the entire design process independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional manual CAD operations and Boolean manipulations are replaced with automated algorithms that process sketch data and generate implant models programmatically. This substitution eliminates time-consuming manual modeling steps while preserving design flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual CAD operations are used for implant design, then design control and precision are maintained, but the process requires advanced engineering skills and creates communication barriers between surgeons and engineers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign precisionVSAvoidengineering skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An automated algorithmic system serves as an intermediary between the surgeon's simple sketches and the complex implant geometry. The system translates intuitive user input into precise engineering models, eliminating the need for surgeons to master complex CAD operations while maintaining design precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Complex manual CAD operations are replaced with automated algorithms that handle the computational complexity. The system automatically performs operations such as surface generation, thickness modeling, and geometry refinement, reducing the skill barrier while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If iterative design discussions between surgeons and engineers are conducted, then design quality and clinical suitability are improved, but the process becomes prone to miscommunication and increases time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoidcommunication time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Surgeons can independently iterate and refine implant designs by directly modifying sketches and observing updated models in real-time. This eliminates the need for back-and-forth communication with engineers while maintaining design quality through immediate visual feedback and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides real-time feedback as surgeons create and modify sketches, automatically updating the implant model and displaying results immediately. This continuous feedback loop enables quality control without requiring external review, reducing communication time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250378209A1Algorithm for Computer-Aided Designing and Modeling of Patient-Specific Implant
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
  • US20250378209A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378209A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378209A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for forming a patient-specific implant (PSI) part for application to a resected body part to form a reconstructed part involves utilizing a StereoLithography (STL) model of the reconstructed part with trace lines and the location of screw holes for screws to fasten the PSI to the resected body part in forming the reconstructed part. The trace lines are processed using cubic-spline data interpolation and smoothing, followed by the generation and transformation of rectangles to create a skeleton that forms the implant's surface model. The screw holes are added to the model after the trace lines are processed. Next, the model is converted into an STL file, which is made available for forming implant material into the PSI.