Power System Stabilizer Auto-Tuning Using PSO and Frequency Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power generating systems require manual tuning of integral of accelerating power type Power System Stabilizers (PSS), which is time-consuming, costly, and requires expertise, leading to high costs and inefficiencies in commissioning generators.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automatically tuning PSS parameters using particle swarm optimization (PSO) and digital excitation control systems, which includes sensors, an automatic voltage regulator, and a control module to determine lead-lag phase compensation time constants and gain values, reducing the need for manual processes and trial-and-error methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual tuning of PSS parameters is performed, then expertise and experience can be utilized to achieve stable system performance, but the commissioning process becomes time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidcommissioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-tuning by automatically determining PSS parameters through computational algorithms (particle swarm optimization and frequency response analysis) without requiring external expert intervention. The control module autonomously analyzes system characteristics and configures optimal parameters, enabling the system to serve itself during commissioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tuning processes with automated computational methods. Instead of experts manually adjusting parameters based on experience, the system uses digital algorithms including particle swarm optimization and frequency response analysis to automatically determine optimal PSS parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual tuning processes are used, then detailed expert knowledge can be applied, but the complexity and cost of the commissioning process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter tuning accuracyVSAvoidcommissioning process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines optimal PSS parameters (lead-lag time constants and gain values) through computational analysis of system frequency response characteristics. The control module calculates parameters such as T1, T2, T3, and Ks based on measured system behavior, replacing manual parameter adjustment with automated parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from system measurements (terminal voltages, frequency responses) to automatically adjust and determine PSS parameters. The control module analyzes the measured frequency response and iteratively optimizes parameters to achieve desired system performance, creating a closed-loop commissioning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If trial-and-error methods are employed for PSS tuning, then system performance can be empirically optimized, but the commissioning cost and duration increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidcommissioning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis of system characteristics before actual PSS implementation. The control module pre-determines optimal parameters through frequency response analysis and computational optimization, eliminating the need for subsequent trial-and-error adjustments and enabling direct deployment of optimized settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12068607B2System and method for automated tuning/configuring of a power system stabilizer (PSS) in a digital excitation control system
Publication Date: 2024.08.20 BASLER ELECTRIC CO
  • US12068607B2 patent drawing
  • US12068607B2 patent drawing
  • US12068607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for automatically tuning/configuring a power system stabilizer (PSS) in a power system digital excitation control system having an automatic voltage regulator (AVR) that includes providing a control input to the AVR as a function of generating a set of tuning PSS lead-lag phase compensation time constants as a function of received generated terminal voltages, generating an uncompensated frequency response as a function of the received set of generated terminal voltages and using particle swarm optimization (PSO) as a function of the generated uncompensated frequency response, generating a tuning PSS gain value as a function of a determined open loop frequency response of the power system, determining a PSS gain margin, determining a tuning PSS gain; and transmitting the determined set of tuning phase compensation time constants and the determined tuning PSS gain value to the control interface of the PSS.