Psychophysiological Response Detection Using Segmented Stress Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current psychophysiological response analysis methods are limited in accurately detecting significant responses (SR) associated with deceptive answers, as they rely on indirect indicators and lack efficient algorithms to differentiate between various stress states and their temporal associations with test question segments and recovery periods.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a hardware processor and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium to receive physiological parameters data, determine stress signals, temporally associate values with test question segments and recovery periods, and calculate segment psychophysiological response scores based on stress signal analysis, incorporating machine learning classifiers to detect neutral, cognitive, positive emotional, negative emotional, and continuous expectation stress states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional polygraph testing methods are used to detect deceptive answers, then physiological responses can be measured, but the ability to accurately differentiate between various stress states and their temporal associations with specific test questions is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of significant psychophysiological responsesVSAvoidcomplexity of stress signal analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test protocol is divided into multiple test question segments separated by recovery periods, allowing stress signals to be temporally associated with specific questions. This segmentation enables precise identification of which questions elicit significant psychophysiological responses while accounting for the temporal dynamics of stress recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Baseline physiological measurements are collected before the test protocol begins, establishing a reference state for each subject. This preliminary action enables subsequent stress signals to be compared against individual baseline values, improving detection accuracy by accounting for inter-subject variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple stress states are monitored simultaneously to improve detection accuracy, then comprehensive stress response analysis is achieved, but the computational complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of deception detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of multi-state stress analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors multiple physiological parameters (heart rate, skin conductance, respiration) and transforms them into a unified stress signal through standardized processing. This parameter transformation approach allows comprehensive multi-state stress monitoring while maintaining computational efficiency through consistent analysis methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

A stress signal intermediary layer is introduced that translates raw physiological data from multiple sources into a standardized stress metric. This intermediary enables reliable deception detection by integrating information from multiple stress states without requiring complex direct analysis of each individual parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If recovery periods are included between test question segments to allow stress normalization, then accurate temporal association of stress responses with specific questions is achieved, but the total test duration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal association accuracy of stress signalsVSAvoidtotal test protocol duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The test protocol employs periodic alternation between test question segments and recovery periods. This structured periodic action creates predictable temporal patterns that facilitate accurate association of stress signals with specific questions, while the regular rhythm helps maintain subject engagement and allows for systematic data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20230284948A1Test protocol for detecting significant psychophysiological response
Publication Date: 2023.09.14 PANGEA LABS LTD
  • US20230284948A1 patent drawing
  • US20230284948A1 patent drawing
  • US20230284948A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprising receiving, as input, physiological parameters data measured in a human subject in response to an administered test question protocol comprising (a) a plurality of test question segments, each comprising at least one test question, and (b) a recovery period following each of the test question segments; determining a stress signal associated with the test question protocol, based, at least in part, on one or more states of stress detected in the physiological parameters data; temporally associating values of the stress signal with the plurality of test question segments and the recovery periods; and calculating, for at least some of the test question segments, a segment psychophysiological response score associated with the responses by the subject, based on an analysis of the temporally associated values of the stress signal.