PT2 Correction for upCCD Ansatz Energy Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The unitary pair coupled cluster double (upCCD) approximation in quantum chemistry simulations introduces errors in predicted energy, particularly in systems like Li2O, due to its restriction of electrons being paired.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating a upCCD Ansatz to determine molecule geometry, performing orbital optimization to generate an orbital optimization upCCD (oo-upCCD) with energy calculation, and applying a second-order perturbation theory (PT2) correction to enhance accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If upCCD Ansatz is used to restrict electrons to be paired, then quantum circuit compilation efficiency is improved, but energy prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum circuit compilation efficiencyVSAvoidenergy prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The energy calculation is segmented into two parts: the upCCD energy (which maintains pairing approximation for efficient circuit compilation) and the PT2 correction energy (which accounts for broken-pair effects). This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently - upCCD for efficiency and PT2 for accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

PT2 correction acts as an intermediary that bridges the gap between the simplified upCCD model and the full correlated wavefunction. It mediates the inclusion of broken-pair effects without requiring the full complexity of general configuration interaction, thus improving accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If broken-pair energy contributions are directly implemented with quantum circuits, then energy prediction accuracy is improved, but circuit depth and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy prediction accuracyVSAvoidcircuit depth and entangling gates
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The broken-pair effects are extracted from the main quantum circuit and handled separately through PT2 correction. Instead of incorporating full broken-pair configurations into the quantum circuit (which would increase depth and complexity), only the essential pairing correlations are kept in the upCCD Ansatz, while broken-pair contributions are computed as a post-processing correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than fully implementing all broken-pair configurations in the quantum circuit, the method applies partial action by using PT2 correction to account for the most significant broken-pair effects. This partial treatment captures the essential physics without the full computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If broken-pair energy contributions are directly implemented with quantum circuits, then energy prediction accuracy is improved, but measurement overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy prediction accuracyVSAvoidenergy measurement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement of broken-pair effects is extracted from the primary energy measurement process. Instead of measuring all configuration interactions, only the upCCD energy is measured directly with constant overhead, while broken-pair contributions are obtained through PT2 correction using a limited set of additional measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes the measurement strategy by measuring reduced density matrices (RDMs) instead of directly measuring all energy contributions. This parameter transformation allows efficient computation of PT2 correction from a manageable set of measurements, reducing the overall measurement overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250053699A1Enhancing the electron pair approximation with measurements for the variational quantum eigensolver
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 IONQ INC
  • US20250053699A1 patent drawing
  • US20250053699A1 patent drawing
  • US20250053699A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for enhancing accuracy of electron pair approximation using non-bosonic perturbation (PT2) correction are provided. The method may comprise generating a unitary pair coupled cluster double (upCCD) Ansatz to determine geometry coordinates of a molecule, inputting, using a graphical user interface, the geometry coordinates of the molecule, performing, using a processor of a computing device comprising the processor and a memory, orbital optimization to generate an orbital optimization upCCD (oo-upCCD) comprising an energy calculation, and performing, using the processor, energy correction on the energy calculation of the oo-upCCD based on a second order perturbation theory (PT2), generating a PT2 correction energy value of the molecule. The computing device may comprise a quantum computer.