Perforated Heater Shield for PTAC Whistle Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners (PTACs) experience a whistling noise due to the proximity of the electric heater and fan wheel, which is not effectively mitigated by traditional methods of supporting or repositioning components, and the source of the noise is attributed to vortex shedding in the tight space between these elements.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a noise-abating flow disruptor, such as a perforated plate or wire mesh screen, positioned between the electric heater and the fan wheel to minimize airflow disruption and reduce tonal noise, combined with strategies like selectively energizing heating elements and staggering their placement to reduce noise at specific frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the electric heater is positioned close to the fan wheel to minimize space and maximize heating efficiency, then the compactness and heating performance are improved, but a whistling noise is generated due to vortex shedding in the tight space between the heater and fan wheel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidwhistling noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A flow disruptor is introduced as an intermediary component between the electric heater and fan wheel. This flow disruptor modifies the airflow pattern in the narrow space between these components, preventing vortex shedding that causes whistling noise while maintaining the close positioning needed for heating efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The flow disruptor is strategically positioned only in the specific region where vortex shedding occurs between the heater and fan wheel, rather than obstructing the entire airflow path. This localized intervention maintains heating efficiency while eliminating noise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a flow disruptor is introduced between the electric heater and fan wheel to reduce noise, then the tonal noise is reduced by at least 5 decibels, but the airflow between the heater and fan wheel is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetonal noiseVSAvoidairflow disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The flow disruptor employs a porous or mesh-like structure that allows airflow to pass through while creating sufficient turbulence to break up vortex shedding. This design reduces noise by at least 5 decibels at peak frequencies between 500 and 1500 Hz while minimizing energy loss from airflow disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Length of moving object

If heating elements are positioned closer to the fan wheel to reduce heater height, then the overall heater height is reduced, but the whistling noise from vortex shedding increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheater heightVSAvoidwhistling noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flow disruptor serves as a mediator that enables the heating elements to be positioned close to the fan wheel (reducing heater height) while simultaneously preventing the vortex shedding that would otherwise cause whistling noise in this compact configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The noise-abating flow disruptor significantly reduces the tonal noise by at least 5 decibels at peak frequencies between 500 and 1500 Hz, making the refrigerant system operate more quietly than without the disruptor, and allows for adjustable heat output by varying the energization of heating elements.

Implementation Method 1

the source of the noise is attributed to vortex shedding in the tight space between these elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex shedding: Kármán Vortex Street

Implementation Method 2

The implementation of a noise-abating flow disruptor, such as a perforated plate or wire mesh screen, positioned between the electric heater and the fan wheel to minimize airflow disruption and reduce tonal noise

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow disruption: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

an electric heater for selective heating and cooling modes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS7802615B2Sound attenuating shield for an electric heater
Publication Date: 2010.09.28 TRANE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US7802615B2 patent drawing
  • US7802615B2 patent drawing
  • US7802615B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sound-abating flow disruptor quiets a PTAC refrigerant system by disturbing the airflow between an energized electric heater and an adjacent fan wheel. In some embodiments, the flow disruptor is a perforated metal plate that attenuates a whistle, which appears to be caused by vortex shedding in the confined area between the energized heater and the fan. In some cases, the heater comprises selectively energizable heating elements of various wattage. The heating elements closest to the fan wheel are the lower wattage ones to minimize the heat near the fan.