Shear-Thinning PTFE Inks for Complex 3D Printing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high melt viscosity and decomposition potential of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) limit its processing in conventional manufacturing methods, making it difficult to fabricate complex designs and resulting in high costs and waste, while existing additive manufacturing techniques face challenges with PTFE's high melt viscosity and small curing areas.

Innovation Solution

Development of shear-thinning inks comprising PTFE particles, gellan gum, and other components, combined with a multistage thermal treatment process, to enable 3D printing of PTFE structures with tunable mechanical properties and complex geometries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional manufacturing methods (injection molding, paste-extrusion) are used for PTFE, then parts can be produced with standard processes, but PTFE's high melt viscosity and decomposition potential prevent successful processing

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprocessabilityVSAvoidprocessing success
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental processing parameters by avoiding melt processing entirely. Instead of heating PTFE to molten state (which causes decomposition), the invention uses a cold-process approach with PTFE dispersion and shear-thinning agents, allowing shaping at room temperature followed by sintering, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of manufacture and processing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal-mechanical processing system (melting and molding) with a chemical-rheological system. By using shear-thinning agents that modify the dispersion's flow properties, the material can be extruded and shaped without melting, substituting thermal processing with rheological control to overcome PTFE's processing limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If powdered compaction and sintering are used for PTFE, then processing is feasible, but fabrication costs increase due to custom tooling and slow processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing feasibilityVSAvoidfabrication speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-forming the PTFE parts through extrusion and shaping of the dispersion before sintering. This preliminary shaping step allows for rapid prototyping and custom geometry creation without requiring expensive custom molds, significantly improving productivity while maintaining processing feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the manufacturing process into distinct stages: dispersion preparation, extrusion/shaping, drying, and sintering. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently and enables rapid iteration during the shaping stage, improving overall fabrication speed while maintaining feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional PTFE processes are used, then parts can be manufactured, but large volumes of non-recyclable waste are created increasing costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing capabilityVSAvoidwaste volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements discarding and recovering by collecting and reusing the PTFE dispersion material that remains after extrusion and shaping. The dispersion can be recovered and reused for subsequent printing operations, significantly reducing waste volume while maintaining manufacturing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by designing a process where the support structures and excess material serve a dual purpose: they provide structural support during printing and can be recovered and reused. The system is self-sufficient in that waste material becomes a reusable resource, reducing overall waste generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Shape

If SLA 3D-printing is used for PTFE, then complex shapes can be fabricated, but small curing areas limit structure size and increase printing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric complexityVSAvoidprinting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the photopolymerization-based SLA system with a rheology-based direct ink writing system. Instead of using light to cure resin, the invention uses shear-thinning properties to enable extrusion of PTFE dispersion, which is then sintered. This substitution allows for larger curing areas and faster printing speeds while maintaining geometric complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental curing parameter from photopolymerization (SLA) to sintering (extrusion-based). This parameter change allows for much larger build volumes and faster printing speeds since the material is deposited in a continuous stream rather than being cured layer-by-layer with light, while still achieving complex geometries through precise extrusion control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The approach allows for the production of PTFE components with mechanical properties similar to compression-molded PTFE, enabling complex and customizable designs with reduced waste and cost, while maintaining hydrophobicity and chemical resistance.

Implementation Method 1

compositions comprising fluoropolymer particles... and one or more shear thinning agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear thinning: Shear Thinning

Implementation Method 2

The printed structure is subjected to a thermal treatment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

fabrication techniques have been developed that are based upon powdered compaction of ceramics and metals followed by sintering

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS20220186055A1Fluoropolymer shear-thinning inks and methods of making and using same
Publication Date: 2022.06.16 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • US20220186055A1 patent drawing
  • US20220186055A1 patent drawing
  • US20220186055A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are compositions (which may inks), methods, devices, and systems that are used with 3D printing. The compositions contain fluoropolymer particles, one or more type of a medium, one or more surfactants, and one or more shear thinning agents. The fluoropolymer component can be one or more of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), perfluoroalkoxy, fluorinated ethylene-propylene, and poly ethyl enetetrafluoroethylene. Cartridges that contain the compositions are also provided. Methods of making the compositions, methods of using the compositions for 3D printing, and articles of manufacture, such as medical devices, are also provided.