PTO Safety Guard U-Shaped Locking Clip Axial Displacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety guards for power take off (PTO) shafts in agricultural equipment are costly due to their complex designs and require multiple components, which increases manufacturing expenses.

Innovation Solution

A U-shaped locking clip with deformable jaws that snap fit onto pins, providing a simple and cost-effective releasable locking mechanism for the safety guard, allowing axial displacement prevention with fewer components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a complex locking mechanism with multiple components is used, then the reliability of axial displacement prevention is improved, but the manufacturing cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial displacement preventionVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking clip integrates multiple functions into a single component: it provides axial positioning through locking portions engaging the groove, retention through interaction with clamp-type clips, and manual operability through its U-shaped design. This merging of functions reduces the number of separate components while maintaining reliability of axial displacement prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking clip serves multiple purposes simultaneously: it acts as a retaining element, a locking element, and an operable component. The same structure provides both the locking function (preventing axial displacement) and the release mechanism (through manual manipulation), eliminating the need for separate specialized components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a complex locking mechanism with multiple components is used, then the reliability of axial displacement prevention is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial displacement preventionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By combining multiple locking and retaining functions into the single locking clip component, the bill of materials is reduced. Fewer parts mean lower material costs, reduced assembly operations, and simplified quality control, all of which contribute to lower manufacturing costs while maintaining the reliability of axial displacement prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking clip appears to be designed as a simple, potentially disposable component that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed. This approach prioritizes low manufacturing cost and simplicity over long-term durability, allowing the system to maintain reliability through ease of replacement rather than through complex, expensive, long-lasting components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If fewer components are used in the locking mechanism, then the manufacturing cost is reduced, but the reliability of axial displacement prevention may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidaxial displacement prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking clip consolidates multiple critical functions into one component, ensuring that axial displacement prevention is maintained through integrated design rather than through multiple separate components. The locking portions, retention features, and operational elements work together within the single clip structure to maintain reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

While reducing the total number of components, the locking clip itself is segmented into functional zones: locking portions for groove engagement, interaction surfaces for clamp-type clips, and structural elements for manual operation. This internal segmentation allows each function to be optimized within the simplified overall structure, maintaining reliability without increasing component count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces manufacturing costs and simplifies the locking mechanism while maintaining effective axial displacement prevention, making it a more economical alternative for PTO safety guards.

Implementation Method 1

a deformable jaw disposed on the locking clip, the at least one clamp-type clip snap fitting onto a respective pin (150,152,154) fixed to the guard body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2935924B1Safety guard for power take off
Publication Date: 2019.02.06 SPAREX
  • EP2935924B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2935924B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2935924B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A safety guard for a power take off shaft comprises a guard body (14,15) for positioning over the PTO shaft (10), and a U-shaped locking clip (26). The clip is slidable in a radial direction with respect to the PTO shaft between a locked position and an unlocked position. The locking clip (26) comprises a pair of locking portions that each extend into an annular groove (24) present on the PTO shaft or present on a guard bearing member mounted to the PTO shaft when the locking member (26) is in the locked position to prevent axial displacement of the guard body relative to the PTO shaft.