Public Response Scoring With Contextual Sentiment Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems and methods fail to effectively quantify public responses to Evaluable Subjects and/or Deeds in real time, trace them to specific actions or omissions, or forecast future behavior or response based on historical patterns.

Innovation Solution

A computer system and method that collects and analyzes public responses to actions or deeds by using natural language processing and sentiment analysis, generating a public response score and graphical user interface to display the score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional sentiment analysis tools are used, then binary sentiment classification (positive vs. negative) can be achieved, but the system cannot capture the intent, temporal significance, and contextual nuance embedded in complex social cues such as public gratitude, civic praise, or ethical disapproval

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesentiment classification accuracyVSAvoidcapability to capture complex social cues
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments public response analysis into multiple dimensions including sentiment polarity, intent classification, temporal significance, and contextual nuance. Each dimension is processed separately through specialized algorithms before being integrated into a comprehensive public response score, enabling precise measurement of complex social cues that binary classification cannot capture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the single-dimensional binary sentiment classification into a multi-parameter evaluation framework. It introduces additional parameters such as public response score, intent type, temporal weight, and contextual markers, allowing the system to adaptively measure and differentiate various types of public responses including gratitude, praise, and ethical disapproval with greater precision and versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If no systematic tracking system is implemented, then data collection from multiple third-party systems remains fragmented and unanalyzed, but real-time quantification and documentation of social impact cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunanalyzed public response dataVSAvoidreal-time quantification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal data collection framework that aggregates public response data from multiple third-party systems including social media platforms, news outlets, and public forums. This multi-functional system simultaneously performs data collection, cleaning, analysis, and quantification across diverse data sources, transforming fragmented unanalyzed data into real-time measurable social impact metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes continuous feedback loops that monitor public responses in real-time, update public response scores dynamically, and provide actionable insights. The feedback mechanism processes incoming data streams, compares them against historical patterns, and adjusts quantification metrics accordingly, enabling the system to maintain current and accurate measurements of social impact as public sentiment evolves

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If traditional reputation scoring systems are used, then consumer reviews or financial performance can be analyzed, but social good contributions and public gratitude cannot be systematically measured or compared

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereputation scoring accuracyVSAvoidscope of measurable social impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system expands the parameter set beyond traditional reputation metrics by introducing specialized parameters for measuring social good contributions. It incorporates public response score, gratitude frequency, civic engagement indicators, and ethical behavior markers, transforming the measurement framework to accommodate and quantify previously unmeasurable aspects of social impact while maintaining compatibility with traditional reputation scoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a new dimension to reputation scoring by introducing a vertical axis for social good measurement alongside the traditional horizontal axis of consumer reviews and financial performance. This multi-dimensional approach allows simultaneous measurement of diverse impact types including public gratitude, charitable contributions, and ethical conduct, enabling comprehensive comparison across different forms of social value creation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250390896A1System and method for analyzing public response
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 RAVAL SACHIN RAMESH
  • US20250390896A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390896A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390896A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented system for evaluating public response of a subject matter, including individuals, entities, events, policies, products, places, ideas, or other evaluable subject. The system collects and verifies data from third party sources, such as social media, news sites, etc. The system identifies deeds of the evaluable subject and corresponding public responses using natural language processing, rules-based logic, sentiment analysis, data modeling, etc. The public responses are weighted, e.g., based on credibility, sentiment time-decay functions, or other factors, to generate a public response score.