Pub/Sub Network Configuration Monitoring for Wiretapping Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In communication systems using Pub/Sub communication with DDS, wiretapping cannot be detected due to the difficulty in grasping the network configuration, making it challenging to identify unauthorized intrusions.
Innovation Solution
A communication system employing a broker-less type publishing/subscribing model with a determination unit that detects anomalies based on network configuration information and predefined white and black lists, utilizing a combined layer of IP, participant, and Pub/Sub relationship layers to identify unauthorized participation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a broker-less type Pub/Sub communication system is used to achieve lightweight and flexible device interconnection, then adaptability and ease of operation are improved, but the ability to detect wiretapping and unauthorized intrusions deteriorates due to difficulty in grasping network configuration
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a configuration management unit as an intermediary component that collects and manages network configuration information from multiple nodes. This mediator enables centralized monitoring and anomaly detection without changing the distributed broker-less architecture, thus resolving the contradiction between system flexibility and security monitoring capability
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback mechanisms where configuration information is continuously collected from nodes, analyzed for anomalies using white lists and black lists, and used to detect unauthorized participations. This feedback loop enables the system to maintain its flexible broker-less structure while achieving reliable anomaly detection through continuous monitoring and comparison against predefined security policies
2Measurement precision
If configuration information is collected from all nodes to enable anomaly detection, then detection precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional monitoring and management components
Solution Approach 1:
The configuration management functionality is segmented into modular units that can be independently deployed and managed. Each node maintains its own configuration information locally, and the system divides the monitoring task into collecting configuration data, analyzing it against white/black lists, and generating anomaly reports. This segmentation reduces the complexity burden on individual components while achieving comprehensive anomaly detection
Solution Approach 2:
Each node in the broker-less system autonomously manages its own configuration information and participates in the anomaly detection process by providing its configuration data. The system uses self-service mechanisms where nodes automatically report their configuration states, and the anomaly detection is performed by comparing these self-reported configurations against predefined white lists and black lists, reducing the need for complex centralized management
Data Source
AI summary
A communication system that performs communication among a plurality of nodes by a broker-less type publishing/subscribing model, includes: a computer including a memory and a processor configured to, in a case where a network configuration of the communication system changes, detect an anomaly of the communication system based on configuration information indicating the network configuration and at least one of a predefined white list or black list.


