PUF Pattern for Anti-Counterfeiting and Condition Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Product piracy and counterfeit goods are prevalent, with existing authentication methods like barcodes being easily copied and requiring extensive administration, while environmental exposure of goods can lead to invalidation of authenticity labels, making it difficult to verify the re-sale conditions of items.

Innovation Solution

A Physical Uncloneable Function (PUF) device with a PUF pattern that degrades upon first use or exposure to predetermined environmental conditions, integrated into labels or sensors, allowing for verification of an item's authenticity and physical condition through unique cryptographic keys and delta-contracting functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication methods like barcodes are used, then authentication can be performed, but the authentication system is easily copied and requires extensive central administration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidadministration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The PUF device enables self-authentication without requiring central administration. Each PUF device contains an unique physical pattern that automatically generates cryptographic keys, allowing items to authenticate themselves without human intervention or central database management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The PUF pattern is designed to be damaged after first use, creating a single-use authentication mechanism. This disposable nature prevents replay attacks and ensures that each authentication is unique, eliminating the need for complex administrative updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If environmental exposure indicators are used to verify re-sale conditions, then environmental compliance can be detected, but dishonest parties can replace invalidated labels with fresh ones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvere-sale condition verificationVSAvoidlabel replacement vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The PUF pattern merges the authentication function with the environmental exposure indicator function into a single integrated system. The same physical pattern that provides unique identification also degrades in response to environmental conditions, making it impossible to separate the two functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The PUF device uses composite physical structures that combine multiple properties: uniqueness for authentication and environmental sensitivity for condition monitoring. This composite nature ensures that both authentication and environmental verification are performed by the same physical object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the PUF pattern is damaged upon first use to prevent counterfeiting, then authenticity verification is improved, but the device cannot be reused for verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-counterfeiting capabilityVSAvoidverification duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The PUF pattern is pre-damaged during manufacturing or initial activation, creating a permanent record of first use before the item enters the supply chain. This preliminary action ensures that any subsequent attempts to clone or reuse the authentication mechanism will fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the PUF pattern degrades over time or due to environmental conditions, then physical condition verification is enabled, but the authentication signal may become inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical condition monitoringVSAvoidauthentication signal consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors the degradation of the PUF pattern and uses this information to determine environmental exposure history. The degradation itself becomes the authentication signal, with the degree of change providing feedback about the item's condition and handling history.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10374812B2Device, system and method for verifying the authenticity integrity and/or physical condition of an item
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US10374812B2 patent drawing
  • US10374812B2 patent drawing
  • US10374812B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A physical uncloneable function (PUF) pattern is used for verifying a physical condition of an item. The PUF pattern is arranged to be damaged in the event that said item is exposed to a predetermined environmental condition. Verification of the physical condition of the item, is carried out by obtaining a measured response from the PUF pattern, and comparing the measured response with a stored response in respect of the PUF.