PUF Watermarking for Secure Electronic Device Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic device tracking systems are insecure and inaccurate due to the ease with which globally unique indicia can be removed, copied, or placed on another device, making them unsuitable for secure identification, authentication, and control within supply chains and the life cycle of electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

The integration of strong physical unclonable function (PUF) technology with cryptographic protocols to create a unified approach for secure identification, authentication, tracking, and control of electronic devices, using watermarks and digital signatures to bind information and objects to specific devices, ensuring authenticity and accountability throughout their life cycle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If external globally unique indicia (QR codes, numbers) are applied to electronic devices for tracking, then device identification and auditing capability is improved, but security and accuracy deteriorate because the indicia can be removed, copied, or placed on another device

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice identification accuracyVSAvoidtracking security
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical/visual external indicia (QR codes, stickers) with an optical field-based identification system. The electronic device emits or modulates optical signals (light, electromagnetic radiation) that encode unique device identifiers. This substitution eliminates the physical vulnerability of external marks while maintaining identification capability through optical detection and verification protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the identification parameter from static external visual marks to dynamic optical field characteristics. Device identifiers are encoded in optical signal properties (frequency, modulation pattern, polarization, intensity) rather than physical markings. This parameter transformation makes identification data harder to replicate and easier to verify through optical measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If simple external markings are used for device tracking, then ease of operation and implementation is improved, but security and anti-cloning capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking implementation simplicityVSAvoiddevice cloning vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple mechanical marking systems with optical field-based identification. Instead of applying physical stickers or etching codes, the system uses optical signals (visible light, infrared, other electromagnetic radiation) to encode and transmit device identifiers. This maintains operational simplicity through automated optical detection while fundamentally improving security against cloning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces optical fields as an intermediary between the device and the tracking system. Rather than direct visual inspection of external marks, the system uses optical signals as a mediator to convey device identity information. This intermediary layer enables secure verification through optical properties that are difficult to replicate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11528152B2Watermarking for electronic device tracking or verification
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 RAYTHEON CO
  • US11528152B2 patent drawing
  • US11528152B2 patent drawing
  • US11528152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generally discussed herein are systems, devices, and methods for device verification. A method can include providing, by test equipment (TE), electrical stimulus consistent with a challenge of a challenge response pair (CRP) to a physical unclonable function (PUF) of a device under test (DUT), receiving, by the TE and from the DUT, a response to the electrical stimulus, comparing, by the TE, the provided response to responses to CRPs in a database including PUF CRPs associated with a device identification and a device type, and validating the identity of the DUT when the response of the PUF to the electrical stimulus matches the response of the CRP or invalidating the identity of the electrical device when the response of the PUF does not match the response of the CRP.