PUFA Oil Deodorization for Palatability and Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The production of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) oil for pet and human consumption is economically challenging due to the high cost of conventional refining, bleaching, winterization, and deodorization processes, which also result in significant yield loss and unpalatable crude oil.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the deodorization of crude PUFA oil, optionally accompanied by degumming or short path evaporator (SPE) processing, to enhance palatability while maintaining a yield of at least 85% of the original crude oil, as measured by animal food preference tests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional RBWD process (refinement, bleaching, winterization, deodorization) is applied to purify crude PUFA oil, then palatability is improved, but production cost increases and yield loss reaches 55%-60%

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepalatabilityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes only the specific harmful components (free fatty acids, phospholipids, pigments, and volatile odorous substances) from crude PUFA oil through selective processing steps, rather than subjecting the entire oil to exhaustive refinement. This targeted extraction approach maintains high PUFA content while improving palatability and preserving yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the conventional RBWD process into separate, optional stages: (1) degumming to remove phospholipids, (2) short path evaporation or refinement to remove free fatty acids, and (3) deodorization to remove volatile odorous substances. This segmentation allows selective application of only necessary steps, reducing overall processing cost and yield loss while achieving acceptable palatability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional RBWD process is applied to purify crude PUFA oil, then palatability is improved, but production cost increases due to equipment, energy, labor and time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepalatabilityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing only the necessary deodorization step (and optionally degumming or short path evaporation) rather than the complete RBWD process. This partial processing achieves sufficient palatability improvement for pet food applications while significantly reducing equipment investment, energy consumption, labor requirements, and processing time compared to full refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs cost-effective, simplified processing equipment for deodorization and optional short path evaporation, replacing expensive conventional refinement equipment. This approach uses more economical methods to achieve the essential function of removing odorous substances, thereby reducing production cost while maintaining acceptable product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If crude PUFA oil is used directly without refinement, then production cost is low and yield is high, but offensive smell and taste make it unpalatable

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveyieldVSAvoidpalatability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes only the specific odorous and unpalatable components (volatile substances, free fatty acids, and phospholipids) from crude PUFA oil through targeted deodorization and optional short path evaporation or refinement. This selective removal preserves the majority of the oil (high yield) while eliminating the offensive smell and taste that make crude oil unpalatable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If full RBWD process is applied to achieve high palatability, then offensive odor and taste are removed, but yield loss reaches 55%-60%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveodor and tasteVSAvoidPUFA oil loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes only the specific odorous and unpalatable components (volatile substances, free fatty acids, and phospholipids) from crude PUFA oil through targeted deodorization and optional short path evaporation or refinement, rather than subjecting the entire oil to exhaustive refinement. This selective extraction approach maintains high PUFA content while improving palatability and preserving yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the conventional RBWD process into separate, optional stages: (1) degumming to remove phospholipids, (2) short path evaporation or refinement to remove free fatty acids, and (3) deodorization to remove volatile odorous substances. This segmentation allows selective application of only necessary steps, reducing overall processing cost and yield loss while achieving acceptable palatability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly improves the palatability of PUFA oil by at least 10 percentage points, with some embodiments achieving increases of up to 45 percentage points, while maintaining a high yield and reducing production costs.

Implementation Method 1

Deodorization refers to the removal of volatile components, secondary oxidation products, free fatty acids, mono- and diglycerides, aldehydes, ketones, chlorinated hydrocarbons, pigments, and persistent organic pollutants.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

The above process is also referred to as RBWD process by the initial letter of the four steps: Refinement, Bleaching, Winterization, and Deodorization.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 3

refining by using a short path evaporator (SPE)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

The short path evaporator (SPE) is a type of evaporator that uses evaporation and condensation to separate and concentrate components of a liquid mixture.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 5

Bleaching removes pigments, secondary oxidation products, trace metals, vitamins, environmental pollutants, and other polar components.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS12325838B2Polyunsaturated fatty acid containing food ingredient with enhanced palatability and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 DSM IP ASSETS BV
  • US12325838B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a refined PUFA oil with an enhanced palatability comparing to the same PUFA oil without refinement. Also disclosed is a food composition for a companion animal or a food for human consumption wherein said food composition comprises the above refined PUFA oil and thus having enhanced palatability. Further disclosed herein is a method for manufacturing the above-mentioned refined PUFA oil wherein said method comprises the step of deodorization.