Pull-Based Inner-Loop Code Deployment for Serverless HPC
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional high performance computing architectures face challenges in rapid code deployment due to complexity, requiring extensive steps and expertise, leading to increased development turnaround time and costs, especially in serverless environments where scaling to zero and accessing multiple container instances is difficult.
Innovation Solution
A central repository for pull-based inner-loop code deployment, where code updates are pushed to a central location, and processing logic in each instance detects and retrieves updates, allowing for hot reloads without restarting containers, while monitoring performance and rolling back if regressions occur.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If conventional deployment methods are used in high performance computing architectures, then code can be deployed to multiple parallel services, but the deployment process becomes complex with many steps and increased development turnaround time
Solution Approach 1:
A central repository is introduced as an intermediary component that manages code updates for multiple service instances. The repository stores code updates and provides them to instances on demand, simplifying the deployment process by centralizing update management rather than requiring direct distribution to each instance
Solution Approach 2:
Service instances automatically check the central repository for code updates and perform self-upgrades without requiring manual intervention or complex deployment orchestration. The instances poll the repository, retrieve updates when available, and apply them autonomously, reducing deployment complexity and turnaround time
2Productivity
If code updates are pushed to each running instance in conventional methods, then all instances can be updated, but the process requires tracking each instance location and restarting them individually
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of the conventional approach where the deployment system pushes code to each instance, the invention inverts the flow by having instances pull code updates from a central repository. Instances automatically check for and retrieve updates, eliminating the need for the deployment system to track and access each instance's location and state
Solution Approach 2:
Each service instance autonomously monitors the central repository for updates, retrieves them when available, and performs self-upgrades. This self-service mechanism eliminates manual tracking and coordination of instance updates, significantly improving both deployment speed and operational ease
3Reliability
If full production-grade deployment is performed, then code changes are deployed to all instances, but the process is costly and time-consuming
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements a lightweight update mechanism that performs only the necessary actions for code updates without the overhead of full production-grade deployment. Instances pull updates from the central repository and apply them through hot reload or simple restarts, avoiding the complex, time-consuming processes of complete production deployments while still achieving comprehensive code distribution
Solution Approach 2:
Service instances autonomously retrieve and apply code updates from the central repository without requiring full deployment cycles. The self-service update mechanism reduces development turnaround time by eliminating redundant deployment steps while ensuring all instances receive code changes through automatic polling and retrieval
Data Source
AI summary
A method includes determining whether a code update for the service is available at a central repository of the computing environment and, in response to determining that the code update is available, retrieving the code update from the central repository. The method further includes performing a modification of the service in view of the code update.


