Pull-In Apparatus Lock Restriction to Prevent Erroneous Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pull-in apparatuses in image forming devices are prone to erroneous unlocking due to accidental release of the locking mechanism, leading to usability issues and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A pull-in apparatus with an arm member and a restriction member that moves between lock and lock-release positions, controlled by action portions to prevent unintended unlocking during insertion or withdrawal of units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking claw is provided to engage with a fixed member for securing the lever member, then the locking reliability is improved, but the risk of erroneous release due to accidental contact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoiderroneous release risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A restriction member is introduced as an intermediary between the locking claw and the external environment. This restriction member selectively permits movement of the locking claw only when the arm member is in the pulled-in state, thereby mediating between the need for secure locking and the risk of accidental release. The restriction member acts as a gatekeeper that allows legitimate locking operations while blocking erroneous releases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The restriction member is designed to dynamically change its state based on the position of the arm member. When the arm member is pulled in, the restriction member transitions from a locked state to an unlocked state, permitting the locking claw to move. When the arm member is in the stand-by position, the restriction member maintains a locked state, preventing unintended movement of the locking claw. This dynamic behavior adapts the locking mechanism's accessibility to the operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the locking claw is always accessible for manual operation, then the ease of operation is improved, but the possibility of unintended unlocking increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking operation accessibilityVSAvoidanti-erroneous release capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The restriction member dynamically adjusts the accessibility of the locking claw based on the arm member's position. In the pulled-in state, the restriction member becomes transparent to locking claw movement, allowing easy operation. In the stand-by position, the restriction member becomes opaque, blocking unintended access. This dynamic gating mechanism preserves ease of operation when needed while preventing erroneous releases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The restriction member applies preliminary anti-action by preemptively blocking the locking claw's movement path when the arm member is in the stand-by position. This preventive measure stops potential erroneous releases before they can occur, while not interfering with legitimate locking operations when the arm member is properly pulled in.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If a recovery procedure is provided for the lever member that has pivoted to the pulled-in position, then the system reliability is improved, but the device complexity and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem recovery capabilityVSAvoidrecovery structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restriction member implements self-service by automatically preventing the erroneous state from occurring in the first place. When the arm member is in the stand-by position, the restriction member autonomously blocks the locking claw, making manual intervention or complex recovery procedures unnecessary. The system serves itself by preventing the error condition rather than requiring user-initiated recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The restriction member takes preliminary action by proactively blocking the locking claw before erroneous release can occur. This preventive measure eliminates the need for post-error recovery procedures by stopping the error chain at its source, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture and reducing user burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12379689B2Pull-in apparatus, image forming apparatus, sheet accommodating apparatus, and draw-out unit
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 CANON KK
  • US12379689B2 patent drawing
  • US12379689B2 patent drawing
  • US12379689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pull-in apparatus configured to pull in a unit toward a predetermined position in an apparatus body includes an arm member, a restriction member, a first action portion and a second action portion. The restriction member is movable between a lock position at which the restriction member restricts movement of the arm member in a first direction and a lock-release position at which the restriction member allows the movement of the arm member in the first direction. Movement of the restriction member from the lock position toward the lock-release position is restricted in a state in which the arm member is at a stand-by position, and is allowed in a state in which the arm member has been moved from the stand-by position in a second direction.