Pull Request Interface for Automatic Source Code Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pull request systems in version control systems, such as GitHub, face issues with merge conflicts and logical conflicts due to outdated differences between the source and destination branches, leading to inefficiencies and potential bugs when reviewers suggest changes without full context of the latest branch updates.

Innovation Solution

The system creates an intermediate merge between the source and destination branches, displaying differences based on the latest states, allowing reviewers to suggest changes directly, which are then propagated to the source branch before merging, ensuring all changes are accounted for and conflicts are minimized.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If reviewers suggest changes based on outdated differences between source and destination branches, then the review process is simpler, but merge conflicts and logical bugs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of reviewVSAvoidmerge accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically updating the source branch with changes from the destination branch before the reviewer submits their changes. This ensures the reviewer is working with the latest code state, preventing merge conflicts and logical bugs while maintaining ease of review through automated background processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring and detecting changes in the destination branch, then automatically applying those changes to the source branch. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the source branch remains synchronized with the destination branch, improving merge accuracy without complicating the review process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system continuously updates the source branch with latest destination changes, then merge accuracy improves, but the complexity of the pull request system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemerge accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting changes in the destination branch and updating the source branch without requiring manual intervention from reviewers or developers. This automated self-updating mechanism improves merge accuracy while keeping the user interface and overall system complexity minimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated update mechanism that mediates between the destination branch changes and the source branch. This intermediary process handles the complexity of continuous synchronization in the background, presenting a simple interface to users while maintaining high merge accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If reviewers work with outdated code differences, then the review process is faster, but logical bugs and merge conflicts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview speedVSAvoidcode accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automatic updates of the source branch with destination changes before reviewers submit their feedback. This preliminary synchronization maintains code accuracy while preserving review speed, as the updates occur automatically in the background without slowing down the reviewer's workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuity of useful action by continuously monitoring destination branch changes and automatically propagating them to the source branch. This continuous background process ensures code accuracy is maintained throughout the review process without interrupting or slowing down the reviewer's productive work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11294667B2Automatically updating source code in version control systems via a pull request
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 ATLASSIAN US INC
  • US11294667B2 patent drawing
  • US11294667B2 patent drawing
  • US11294667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically updating source code in a first source code branch using a pull request is disclosed. The method includes: displaying a pull request user interface associated with the first source code branch, the pull request user interface comprising a code change suggestion including an original line of source code to be changed and a new line of source code to replace the original line of source code; receiving user input to accept the code change suggestion; propagating the source code change to the first source code branch such that an original line of source code in the first source code branch is replaced with the new line of source code; and upon successfully propagating the source code change to the first source code branch, updating the pull request user interface to indicate that the code change suggestion is applied and the pull request is modified.