Pulsatile Orthodontic Device with Precision Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current orthodontic treatments using static forces are uncomfortable, aesthetically unpleasing, and lengthy, with limited effectiveness in addressing complex malocclusions, and existing vibrating devices lack precision and comfort in delivering cyclic forces for accelerated tooth movement.

Innovation Solution

An orthodontic appliance with an extraoral vibratory source and an intraoral bite plate that uses a processor to control and adjust vibration frequency and force, providing a consistent and comfortable cyclic force between 20-40 Hz and 0.1-0.5 N, with a mechanism for monitoring and improving patient compliance through data capture and feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If static mechanical force is used for orthodontic treatment, then bone remodeling occurs, but treatment time is lengthy (24 months average)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth movement rateVSAvoidtreatment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic pulsatile forces (0.5-5 Hz frequency) instead of continuous static force. The device delivers cyclic compression and decompression phases to the periodontal ligament, creating oscillating mechanical stimulation that accelerates bone remodeling and tooth movement, reducing treatment time from 24 months to potentially half that duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from static orthodontic force application to dynamic pulsatile force delivery. The system uses a motor-driven mechanism with variable frequency control to deliver time-varying mechanical stimuli that mimic physiological loading patterns, enhancing osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity for faster bone turnover and tooth movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If conventional orthodontic appliances are used, then teeth are realigned, but patient comfort is reduced due to discomfort and pain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient comfortVSAvoiddiscomfort and pain
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The pulsatile loading pattern with rest periods between compression phases reduces continuous stress on the periodontal ligament and bone. The cyclic nature of the force application allows tissue recovery during decompression phases, minimizing pain and discomfort while maintaining effective tooth movement, thereby improving patient comfort and compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts force magnitude (0.5-5 Newtons) and frequency (0.5-5 Hz) parameters based on treatment stage and patient response. This parameter optimization ensures forces remain within comfortable thresholds while maintaining therapeutic effectiveness, reducing harmful discomfort and pain associated with conventional high-force static appliances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If traditional orthodontic appliances are used, then tooth movement occurs, but aesthetic appearance is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearanceVSAvoidunaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces traditional visible mechanical orthodontic appliances (braces, wires, brackets) with an intraoral device that delivers pulsatile forces through a bite plate or attachment system. This substitution maintains aesthetic appearance by avoiding external metallic components while achieving the same orthodontic treatment goals through controlled mechanical vibration and pulsatile loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If existing vibrating devices are used for accelerated tooth movement, then cyclic forces are applied, but precision and comfort are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment accelerationVSAvoidvibration control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors and control circuitry that monitor force magnitude, frequency, and duration of pulsatile delivery. This feedback mechanism ensures precise control of mechanical stimulation parameters, maintaining forces within the optimal 0.5-5 Newtons range at 0.5-5 Hz frequency, thereby achieving accurate and repeatable treatment acceleration while preventing excessive forces that would reduce comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The device enables dynamic adjustment of vibration frequency and force amplitude parameters throughout treatment. The system can modify these parameters in real-time based on treatment progress and patient response, providing precise control over the mechanical stimulation delivered to accelerate tooth movement while maintaining comfort thresholds, unlike fixed-parameter existing vibrating devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The appliance significantly accelerates orthodontic tooth movement by up to 50%, reduces treatment time from two years to one, and enhances patient compliance and comfort by providing a non-static force-based treatment modality that can address a wide range of malocclusions and craniofacial anomalies.

Implementation Method 1

an extraoral vibratory source and an intraoral bite plate that uses a processor to control and adjust vibration frequency and force, providing a consistent and comfortable cyclic force between 20-40 Hz

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

Bone is remodeled by the concerted activities of 3 cell types—osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts. Mechanical loading is sensitized by the dendritic processes and transferred to biochemical responses involved in control of osteoblast and osteoclast function.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10449015B2Pulsatile orthodontic device
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 DENTSPLY LLC
  • US10449015B2 patent drawing
  • US10449015B2 patent drawing
  • US10449015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A processor containing software allowing for measuring the speed of a motor, and adjusting that speed by pulse width modulation is provided. A dedicated voltage limiter prevents excess speed, and a battery charge management controller to charge the battery and monitor the battery charge status, ensures battery voltage is regulated to 3.3 V. These additional features contribute to safety, such that when included on an orthodontic remodeling device they allow safe and effective vibration, with minimal changes in frequency and force and no danger of excess speed or power.