Pulse Arc Welding Dual Peak Current Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pulse arc welding methods face instability when the mixing ratio of shield gas deviates from the standard ratio, leading to unpredictable arc conditions and poor welding quality due to fluctuations in argon gas ratios, resulting in undercuts and increased sputtering.

Innovation Solution

A pulse arc welding method that incorporates a dual peak current strategy, where a first peak current forms the arc anode point at the upper portion of the droplet even with varying shield gas ratios, and a second peak current ensures stable droplet transfer without undercuts, using a stepped waveform with a first peak period and a second peak period to maintain arc stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single peak current is used in conventional pulse arc welding, then the welding process is simple to control, but arc stability deteriorates when shield gas mixing ratio deviates from standard

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc stabilityVSAvoidcurrent waveform complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The peak current period is divided into two distinct sub-periods: a first peak current period (Ip1) and a second peak current period (Ip2). This segmentation allows each current level to perform a specific function - the first period establishes arc anode point position while the second period ensures stable droplet transfer, thereby maintaining arc stability without requiring complex real-time adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The welding process uses periodic pulse current with a specific cycle: base current period (Tb), first peak current period (Tp1), second peak current period (Tp2), and base current period (Tb). This periodic action with carefully controlled durations ensures that the arc remains stable even when shield gas composition varies, as the dual-peak structure compensates for gas ratio fluctuations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Strength

If peak current is increased to maintain arc strength, then welding penetration is improved, but undercuts and sputtering increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweld penetrationVSAvoidundercuts and sputtering
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic current control by implementing two different peak current levels (Ip1 and Ip2) within a single pulse cycle. The first peak current Ip1 is set higher to ensure adequate penetration and arc strength, while the second peak current Ip2 is reduced to prevent excessive arc force that causes undercuts and sputtering. This dynamic adjustment within the pulse cycle optimizes both penetration and surface quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the current parameter dynamically by introducing a stepped waveform with two distinct peak current values. The first peak current Ip1 is optimized for penetration, while the second peak current Ip2 is optimized for droplet transfer stability. This parameter change approach allows the system to achieve both deep penetration and clean welding without undercuts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If shield gas mixing ratio is adjusted to optimize welding, then welding quality is improved, but arc stability deteriorates when ratio deviates from standard

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding qualityVSAvoidarc stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dual peak current structure acts as a feedback mechanism that compensates for shield gas ratio variations. When gas composition deviates from optimal, the first peak current establishes the arc anode point position, and the second peak current adjusts the droplet transfer characteristics, thereby maintaining arc stability despite gas ratio changes. This built-in compensation reduces sensitivity to gas mixing variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maintains arc stability and prevents undercuts, ensuring consistent bead quality even with shield gas ratio fluctuations, reducing sputtering and preventing excessive arc strength, thereby enhancing welding quality.

Implementation Method 1

an arc is struck between the welding wire and the base metal, and the wire transfers a droplet to the base metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectArc heating: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 2

the wire transfers a droplet to the base metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentUS9061365B2Pulse arc welding method
Publication Date: 2015.06.23 DAIHEN CORP
  • US9061365B2 patent drawing
  • US9061365B2 patent drawing
  • US9061365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In pulse arc welding, a welding wire is fed at a rate corresponding to a current average set value. An arc is struck by passing a peak current for a peak period and a base current for a base period, where the peak and base periods make one pulse period. The arc transfers a droplet from the wire. The peak period includes a first peak period for a first peak current and a second peak period for a smaller second peak current. The first peak period and current are determined so that an arc anode point is formed at the top of the droplet even if the shield gas mixing ratio deviates from a standard value. The second peak period and current are determined so that one droplet is transferred during every pulse period, and beads are formed with no undercuts.