Pulse Arc Welding Wire Feed Synchronization for Stable Droplet Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pulse arc welding methods struggle to maintain the state of one pulse cycle-one droplet transfer, leading to variations in welding quality.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling pulse arc welding that involves feeding a welding wire forward and backward, with synchronized changes in feed speed and current modulation, ensuring the one pulse cycle-one droplet transfer state is maintained.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional pulse arc welding is used with fixed feed speed, then the welding process is simple to operate, but the welding quality deteriorates due to deviation from one pulse cycle-one droplet transfer state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding qualityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The feed speed is made dynamic by changing it in synchronization with the pulse current waveform. The feed speed increases during the peak current period and decreases during the base current period, allowing the system to adapt to varying welding conditions while maintaining the one pulse cycle-one droplet transfer state. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by making the feed speed responsive to real-time welding state rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The feed speed is adjusted periodically in synchronization with the pulse cycle. The feed speed waveform is designed to correspond with the current waveform, creating a periodic pattern where feed speed increases during peak current and decreases during base current. This periodic action ensures consistent droplet transfer timing while maintaining operational simplicity through automated synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Manufacturing precision

If the feed speed is adjusted to maintain one pulse cycle-one droplet transfer state, then the welding quality improves, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet transfer consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from the pulse current waveform to automatically adjust the feed speed. By detecting the current waveform characteristics and synchronizing the feed speed adjustments accordingly, the system maintains precise droplet transfer timing without requiring complex manual intervention. The feed speed waveform is generated based on feedback from the actual welding state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically generates the feed speed waveform based on the pulse current waveform without requiring external complex control mechanisms. The system self-adjusts by synchronizing the feed speed changes with the current waveform characteristics, making the control process self-regulating and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If reverse feeding is implemented during base period, then the droplet transfer timing is improved, but the feed mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet transfer timingVSAvoidfeed mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of only forward feeding the wire, the system implements reverse feeding during the base current period. This inversion of the conventional unidirectional feed approach allows the wire to be fed backward, creating optimal timing for droplet transfer. The bidirectional feeding capability is synchronized with the pulse waveform to achieve precise droplet release timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The feed mechanism is made dynamic by enabling bidirectional movement (forward and reverse feeding). The feed direction and speed are continuously adjusted based on the pulse cycle phase, with reverse feeding occurring during the base period and forward feeding during the peak period. This dynamic bidirectional control optimizes droplet transfer timing while using the same feed mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures consistent welding quality by maintaining the one pulse cycle-one droplet transfer state, even when welding conditions vary, resulting in excellent welding results.

Implementation Method 1

providing a peak rise current that rises from a value of a base current to a value of a peak current during a peak rise period, providing the peak current during a peak period

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric arc: Electric Arc

Data Source

PatentEP4588600A1Pulse arc welding control method
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 DAIHEN CORP
  • EP4588600A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4588600A1 patent drawingFigure 2(A)~2(C)
  • EP4588600A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for controlling pulse arc welding. The method includes feeding a welding wire, and providing a number of currents such as: a peak rise current that rises from a value of a base current to a value of a peak current during a peak rise period; the peak current during a peak period; a peak fall current that falls from the value of the peak current to the value of the base current during a peak fall period; and the base current during a base period. The method also includes repeating the provision of the currents as one pulse cycle to perform welding. The welding wire is fed forward and backward repeatedly, and is fed backward at least during the base period.