Pulse Oximetry Sensor Self-Monitoring for Replacement Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pulse oximetry sensors rely on operator-driven replacement, which is prone to errors, negligence, and misuse, leading to inaccurate data and potential patient safety issues due to soiled, damaged, or overused sensors.

Innovation Solution

A sensor with a memory device that tracks usage information and calculates its own life expectancy, providing a replacement indication when predetermined limits are reached, using a combination of empirical and theoretical data to determine when the sensor needs to be replaced.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If operator-driven replacement is used, then cost is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to errors and negligence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor replacement reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor monitors its own usage conditions and determines when replacement is needed, eliminating dependency on operator judgment. The sensor's microprocessor tracks cumulative usage parameters and autonomously generates replacement signals, making the system self-regulating and removing human error from the replacement decision process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor usage conditions (temperature, humidity, cumulative use time) and provides feedback through the microprocessor to determine when replacement thresholds are met. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures timely replacement based on actual sensor degradation rather than fixed schedules or operator memory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If periodic replacement is implemented, then sensor accuracy is maintained, but loss of time occurs due to replacement cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor measurement accuracyVSAvoidtime for sensor replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor monitors its own degradation in advance and generates replacement signals before actual failure occurs. By continuously tracking usage parameters and comparing them against predetermined thresholds, the system prepares for replacement proactively rather than reactively, ensuring continuous operation and minimizing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The replacement timing is dynamic rather than static - the system adjusts replacement decisions based on actual sensor degradation rates, environmental conditions, and usage patterns. This allows optimization of replacement timing to balance accuracy maintenance with time loss minimization, replacing sensors based on actual need rather than fixed schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If sensor life monitoring is added, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor life monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidsensor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The microprocessor serves multiple functions: it processes physiological signals from the sensor, monitors environmental conditions (temperature, humidity), tracks cumulative usage parameters, determines replacement timing, and generates replacement signals. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate components into a single integrated unit, minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses digital copies of usage data and environmental parameters stored in memory, rather than physical monitoring mechanisms for each parameter. By maintaining digital records of temperature, humidity, and usage cumulative values, the system achieves comprehensive monitoring with minimal physical hardware additions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures timely and accurate replacement of pulse oximetry sensors, reducing operator errors and maintaining patient safety by automatically monitoring and indicating when a sensor has reached the end of its useful life.

Implementation Method 1

The photodiode is positioned at the opposite side of the finger to detect the emitted light as it emerges from the outer tissues of the finger. The photodiode generates a signal based on the emitted light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

The pulse oximeter determines blood oxygen saturation by computing the differential absorption by the arterial blood of the two wavelengths (red and infrared) emitted by the sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption Spectroscopy: Absorption Spectroscopy

Data Source

PatentUS20250090060A1System and method for monitoring the life of a physiological sensor
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 MASIMO CORP
  • US20250090060A1 patent drawing
  • US20250090060A1 patent drawing
  • US20250090060A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure include a sensor configured to store in memory indications of sensor use information and formulas or indications of formulas for determining the useful life of a sensor from the indications of sensor use information. A monitor connected to the sensor monitors sensor use and stores indications of the use on sensor memory. The monitor and/or sensor compute the useful life of the sensor from the indications of use and the formulas. When the useful life of the sensor is reached, an indication is given to replace the sensor.