Adaptive Pulse Rate Judgment via Dynamic Range Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pulse rate monitoring technologies face challenges in accurately determining the appropriateness of calculated pulse rates due to rapid changes, erroneous judgments, and impaired responsiveness, particularly when setting variation acceptable ranges, leading to incorrect classifications of normal and abnormal values.

Innovation Solution

A biological information processing device that includes a pulse rate calculation part, a deviation degree judgment part, a reliability judgment part, and an appropriateness judgment part to determine the appropriateness of the calculated pulse rate based on the deviation degree and reliability, with adaptive adjustment of the variation acceptable range based on continuous improperness judgments and body motion analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the number of threshold times is increased to avoid erroneous judgment, then the reliability of pulse rate judgment is improved, but the responsiveness of the system deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of pulse rate judgmentVSAvoidresponsiveness time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the variation acceptable range based on the exercise state of the test subject. When the exercise state changes (start/stop of exercise), the system adapts the acceptable range to accommodate rapid pulse rate changes, reducing the number of threshold times needed for judgment and thereby improving responsiveness while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of variation acceptable range width based on different exercise states. By widening the range during exercise transitions and narrowing it during stable states, the system reduces erroneous judgments without requiring excessive threshold times, thus balancing reliability and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a fixed variation acceptable range is used for pulse rate judgment, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to changing pulse rate trends deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of judgment systemVSAvoidadaptability to pulse rate changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic variation acceptable range that automatically adjusts based on the detected exercise state. The range widens during exercise transitions (start/stop) when pulse rate changes rapidly, and narrows during steady-state exercise, providing adaptability without requiring complex manual configuration or multiple fixed ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects exercise state changes and self-adjusts the variation acceptable range without user intervention. This self-service mechanism maintains high adaptability to pulse rate trends while keeping the device complexity low, as the adjustment logic is embedded in the automatic judgment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the variation acceptable range is widened to accommodate rapid pulse rate changes, then the adaptability is improved, but the measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to follow rapid pulse rate changesVSAvoidprecision of pulse rate measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the variation acceptable range width based on exercise state transitions. During rapid changes (exercise start/stop), the range widens to accommodate the changes, preventing erroneous improper judgments. During stable exercise states, the range narrows to maintain measurement precision, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of variation acceptable range width according to different exercise states. By adjusting this parameter to be larger during transitions and smaller during steady states, the system achieves both adaptability to rapid changes and precision during stable measurement, eliminating the need for a fixed compromise value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9307943B2Biological information processing device
Publication Date: 2016.04.12 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US9307943B2 patent drawing
  • US9307943B2 patent drawing
  • US9307943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining an appropriateness of a calculated pulse rate is provided. In a pulse rate monitor, a pulse rate calculation part calculates the pulse rate of the test subject based on the result detected by a pulse wave sensor. Then, a pulse rate difference calculation part calculates a difference (pulse rate difference) between a reference pulse rate and a calculated pulse rate, and a deviation degree is determined based on the pulse rate difference. Also, a SN ratio calculation part calculates a SN ratio of a pulse wave signal detected by the pulse wave sensor, and a reliability of the calculation result in the pulse rate calculation part is determined based on the SN ratio. Then, a pulse rate appropriateness judgment part determines an appropriateness of the calculated pulse rate based on the pulse rate difference (deviation degree) and the SN ratio (reliability).