Wearable Pulse Sensor Signal Quality Estimation Using Classifier Cascade

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wearable cardiovascular monitoring devices face challenges in accurately extracting cardiovascular parameters due to noise sources like motion artifacts and sensitivity to sensor placement, especially in non-expert users, as optical and pressure-based sensing methods are prone to contamination and incorrect placement.

Innovation Solution

A wearable cardiovascular monitoring device uses a classifier cascade to analyze progressively larger data windows and provides user feedback on signal quality, employing a sample-to-sample transition matrix to determine signal quality without relying on motion filtering or signal segmentation, ensuring correct sensor placement and data quality before parameter calculation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If motion filtering or signal segmentation methods are used to improve signal quality, then noise artifacts can be reduced, but device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter being measured from filtered signal characteristics to transition matrix properties. Instead of filtering the signal to remove motion artifacts, the method uses a sample-to-sample transition matrix that captures the probabilistic relationship between consecutive signal samples. This matrix approach transforms the signal quality assessment into a parameter-based evaluation that is inherently robust to motion artifacts without requiring complex filtering operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If larger data windows are analyzed to improve confidence level, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfidence levelVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the confidence assessment into multiple hierarchical levels corresponding to different data window sizes. Instead of requiring a single large data window for any confidence assessment, the system evaluates confidence at progressively larger scales (e.g., individual pulses, sequences of pulses, extended periods). This segmentation allows the system to provide timely feedback at smaller time scales while still achieving high measurement precision when larger windows are ultimately analyzed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If user feedback is provided continuously to improve ease of operation, then sensor placement accuracy improves, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor placementVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic feedback provision based on confidence level thresholds rather than continuous feedback. The system monitors signal quality continuously but provides user feedback only when confidence levels cross predefined thresholds or when placement corrections are needed. This periodic action pattern reduces energy consumption associated with continuous display updates and processing while still effectively guiding users to proper sensor placement through timely feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10765331B2Wearable pulse sensing device signal quality estimation
Publication Date: 2020.09.08 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US10765331B2 patent drawing
  • US10765331B2 patent drawing
  • US10765331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first data window of a pulse waveform signal comprising a first number of samples is analyzed to determine a level of confidence that a pulse sensing device is placed correctly. If an initial level of confidence is met, the user is given positive feedback, and a second data window of a pulse waveform signal comprising a second, larger number of samples is analyzed. If an increased level of confidence is met, the user is given increased positive feedback. If a level of confidence is not met, the user is given negative feedback. If a final level of confidence is met, the user is given feedback that the pulse sensing device is placed correctly.