Pulse Shaping Filter Optimization in Fiber Optic Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pulse shaping optimization methods in fiber optic networks do not account for system impairments and inter-channel distortions, leading to suboptimal filter shapes and performance issues, especially in multi-channel systems with super-Nyquist channel spacing.

Innovation Solution

A system-level optimization framework that iteratively adjusts filter coefficients of pulse shaping filters and matched filters in transmitters and receivers to maximize the Q-factor, using Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) algorithm, considering all operating parameters and conditions, including inter-symbol interference and hardware imperfections, to achieve a global optimal pulse shape.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional pulse shaping optimization methods are used, then pulse shapes can be optimized for specific objectives such as tolerance to jitter or reduction of peak-to-average power ratio, but these methods do not account for system impairments and inter-channel distortions, resulting in suboptimal filter shapes for multi-channel systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepulse shape optimization accuracyVSAvoidapplicability to multi-channel systems with super-Nyquist channel spacing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization problem by considering each channel's pulse shape independently while accounting for inter-channel distortions through a systematic approach. The method optimizes pulse shapes for multiple channels with super-Nyquist spacing by addressing each channel's specific impairments while maintaining awareness of neighboring channel interactions, thereby achieving both specific objective optimization and multi-channel adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by adjusting filter coefficients dynamically based on measured Q-factors and system conditions. The optimization process modifies pulse shaping parameters adaptively, considering actual system impairments and inter-channel effects, transforming fixed conventional pulse shapes into dynamically optimized parameters that work across multiple channels with different spacing requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If theoretical or offline optimization procedures are used to minimize Intersymbol Interference, then pulse shapes can be optimized based on calculations, but these approaches do not take into account system impairments such as finite quantification, filtering effects, and interaction between submodules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter coefficient optimization precisionVSAvoidperformance under actual system impairments
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by measuring actual Q-factors in the system and using these measurements to guide the optimization process. The method iteratively adjusts filter coefficients based on real system performance data, incorporating feedback from actual signal transmission through impaired channels. This closed-loop approach ensures that optimized pulse shapes account for finite quantification, filtering effects, and submodule interactions that theoretical calculations cannot capture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization process performs self-service by automatically adapting to actual system conditions without requiring manual intervention or pre-programmed impairment compensation. The system measures its own performance metrics (Q-factors) and uses these self-generated data to drive the optimization algorithm, enabling the system to self-optimize pulse shapes based on actual operating conditions rather than relying on external theoretical models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If conventional optimization approaches are used, then pulse shapes can be optimized for single-channel scenarios, but these approaches do not consider the fact that DWDM channels experience both intra- and inter-channel distortions, therefore obtaining a global optimal solution is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle-channel optimization efficiencyVSAvoidglobal optimization capability for multi-channel DWDM systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves universality by developing an optimization framework that simultaneously handles single-channel and multi-channel scenarios. The method is designed to optimize pulse shapes for DWDM channels experiencing both intra-channel and inter-channel distortions, making it universally applicable across different channel spacing configurations including super-Nyquist spacing. This multi-functional approach allows the same optimization process to work whether optimizing one channel or multiple channels simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9628189B2System optimization of pulse shaping filters in fiber optic networks
Publication Date: 2017.04.18 CIENA CORP
  • US9628189B2 patent drawing
  • US9628189B2 patent drawing
  • US9628189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Optimization systems and methods are described configured to optimize filter coefficients in pulse shaping filters in transmitters and matched filters in receivers to maximize Q-factor in a fiber optic system. The systems and methods include receiving a measured Q-factor for one or more channels; iteratively adjusting filter coefficients of the pulse shaping filters and the matched filters to maximize a measured Q-factor of a channel of the one or more channels; and setting the filter coefficients of the pulse shaping filters and the matched filters to optimized values based on the iteratively adjusting.