Pulse-Width Fault Power Control for Human-Safe Energy Limiting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As power levels increase in applications like Power over Ethernet (PoE) and Powered Fiber Cable (PFC), there is a need to limit the energy delivered into a fault without reducing the amplitude of current pulses, to ensure safety and compliance with standards that prevent let-go or ventricular fibrillation.

Innovation Solution

A fault managed power system that progressively reduces the duration of current pulses instead of their amplitudes upon fault detection, using a predefined number of consecutive pulses or a maximum allowed fault interval, to limit cumulative effects below a predefined threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If power levels are increased in PoE and PFC applications, then power delivery capability is improved, but the energy delivered into a fault increases creating safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery capabilityVSAvoidenergy delivered into fault
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic current pulses to deliver power over the cable. Upon fault detection, the controller modifies the pulse width (duration) of these periodic pulses, progressively reducing them over a predefined number of pulses while maintaining the periodic nature of power delivery. This allows continued power delivery at reduced energy levels during the fault condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the pulse width parameter of the current pulses in response to fault detection. The controller progressively reduces the pulse width from an initial value over a predefined number of pulses, thereby reducing the energy delivered into the fault while maintaining the same pulse amplitude and frequency, thus resolving the contradiction between power delivery and fault safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the amplitude of current pulses is reduced to limit fault energy, then safety is improved, but power delivery capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault energyVSAvoidpower delivery capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the pulse width parameter based on fault detection and the current pulse number. The pulse width is progressively reduced over a predefined number of pulses and then restored to normal after the fault condition is resolved. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain full power delivery capability under normal conditions while automatically limiting fault energy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed with predetermined parameters including the number of pulses over which to reduce pulse width, the reduction percentage, and the criteria for fault detection. These parameters are configured in advance to ensure that when a fault occurs, the system can immediately begin the pulse width reduction sequence to limit energy delivery before significant damage or harm occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If pulse width is progressively reduced over multiple pulses, then fault energy is limited, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecumulative fault energyVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a feedback mechanism where the controller continuously monitors for fault conditions and adjusts the pulse width accordingly. When a fault is detected, the controller implements a predefined pulse width reduction sequence over a specific number of pulses. After the reduction sequence completes or the fault is resolved, the system restores normal pulse width. This feedback-based approach automates the complexity, making the control mechanism manageable despite the multi-step response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system is configured with predetermined parameters for fault response including the number of pulses for reduction, the reduction percentage, and restoration criteria. These actions are prepared in advance, so when a fault occurs, the controller simply executes the pre-planned sequence rather than calculating complex responses in real-time. This preliminary configuration reduces the operational complexity of the control mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250364798A1Pulse Width Modulated Fault Managed Power Systems
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA INC
  • US20250364798A1 patent drawing
  • US20250364798A1 patent drawing
  • US20250364798A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fault managed power system (FMPS) and method therefor can limit the cumulative effects of repeated current pulses on the human body during a fault without changing the amplitudes of the current pulses. Upon detection of a fault, the fault managed power system progressively reduces the durations of the current pulses (i.e., ON intervals) instead of the amplitudes to limit the cumulative effects of the current pulses. The fault managed power system can perform the progressive pulse width reductions in increments or steps that limit the cumulative effects of the current pulses to below a predefined energy level. In some embodiments, the predefined level is a level that could prevent let-go or cause ventricular fibrillation in a human body. Such a fault managed power system advantageously provides a simple and efficient way to limit the energy delivered into a fault without having to change the amplitudes of the current pulses.