Pulsed Injector Reactor Flow Control for Fast Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reactor control systems are unable to provide very fast reactant flow responses without compromising fuel/air mixing, especially in high-temperature environments like catalytic partial oxidation reactors, where carbon formation and coke deposition are significant concerns.

Innovation Solution

Integration of an atomizer design with pulsed injectors, such as electromagnetic or piezoelectric injectors, for precise control of fuel and air flows, allowing for rapid adjustments in the O/C ratio to maintain optimal mixing and prevent coking, using modular catalytic reactors with Microlith® substrate and catalyst technology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If standard flow controllers are used, then the system is simple and reliable, but the response time is too slow to meet dynamic reactor needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces standard mechanical flow controllers with electromagnetic or piezoelectric pulsed injectors. These electronic actuators respond much faster to control signals, enabling the system to meet the dynamic response requirements of modern catalytic reactors while maintaining acceptable complexity through integration with existing control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs pulsed injection rather than continuous flow control. By delivering reactants in controlled pulses, the system achieves precise temporal control over fuel and air delivery, enabling fast response times while using simpler pulse-width modulation control strategies compared to continuous analog control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Speed

If high speed modulating valves are used, then the response time is fast, but the cost is high and control is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidcontrol ease
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes expensive high-speed mechanical modulating valves with electromagnetic or piezoelectric injectors. These electronic actuators provide comparable or superior response times but are easier to control through standard electronic interfaces and integrate more seamlessly with modern digital control systems, reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Quantity of substance

If low flows are used in small reactors, then the system is compact, but the average velocity is insufficient for adequate fuel atomization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel flow rateVSAvoidatomization quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses pulsed injection to deliver fuel in discrete bursts rather than continuous low flow. This periodic delivery creates high instantaneous velocities during each pulse, enabling effective atomization and mixing even in compact reactors with inherently lower average flow rates. The pulsed nature compensates for the reduced overall flow quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static continuous flow to dynamic pulsed flow. By varying the injection timing, duration, and intensity of each pulse, the system optimizes atomization quality for different operating conditions while maintaining compact reactor dimensions. The dynamic control allows adequate velocity during critical injection phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables fast and precise control of reactant flows with short time constants, achieving high selectivity for CO and H2 production while resisting carbon deposition and maintaining reactor performance, as demonstrated by achieving 98.4% H2 yield with pulsed electromagnetic injectors.

Implementation Method 1

pulsed injectors, such as electromagnetic or piezoelectric injectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic actuation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

pulsed injectors, such as electromagnetic or piezoelectric injectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric actuation: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

an atomizer design with pulsed injectors... capable of providing sufficient atomization of fuels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomization: Fluid Spray

Data Source

PatentUS8439990B2Reactor flow control apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.05.14 PRECISION COMBUSTION INC
  • US8439990B2 patent drawing
  • US8439990B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for fuel reforming is provided that utilizes pulsed injectors for a fuel flow controller and an air flow controller, and the injectors are integrated with an atomizing mixer thereby producing a fuel-air mixture having an O/C Ratio which, in turn, is passed to a Catalytic Partial Oxidation reactor. Use of this apparatus permits beneficial long term operation of this Catalytic Partial Oxidation reactor.