Pump Pressure Compensation via Closed-Loop Motor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-stage pumps in semiconductor manufacturing experience pressure drift issues, leading to sharp pressure spikes and fluid dynamics problems, which can damage chemicals and result in uneven dispensing, wasting expensive photochemicals.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop control system is implemented to monitor and maintain baseline pressure in the dispense chamber by adjusting the dispense motor, ensuring that pressure variations are corrected before fluid dispensing, using a combination of pressure sensors and motor control to regulate the pumping process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a multi-stage pump is used to dispense photochemicals, then the pumping capability and fluid delivery are improved, but pressure spikes and pressure drift occur causing fluid damage and dispensing inaccuracies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepumping capabilityVSAvoidpressure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by monitoring pressure continuously and making compensatory motor adjustments before pressure spikes can damage the fluid or cause dispensing errors. The pressure compensation occurs proactively during the ready segment, maintaining baseline pressure before the dispense operation begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring pressure in the dispense chamber and using this information to adjust the dispense motor position. The controller compares actual pressure readings with the desired baseline pressure and makes real-time adjustments to compensate for pressure drift, ensuring stable pressure throughout the dispensing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If pressure compensation control is added to maintain baseline pressure, then pressure stability and dispensing accuracy are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dispense motor serves multiple functions: it performs the primary dispense operation and simultaneously functions as a pressure compensation actuator. By controlling the motor position during the ready segment, the system compensates for pressure drift without requiring a separate compensation mechanism, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining pressure stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its existing components (dispense motor, pressure sensor, and controller) to perform pressure compensation autonomously. The controller automatically adjusts the motor position based on pressure feedback without requiring external intervention or additional complex control systems, enabling the pump to self-correct pressure drift.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If the dispense motor is controlled to maintain baseline pressure during ready segment, then pressure drift is compensated and dispensing accuracy is improved, but the operation time increases due to additional control cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing accuracyVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure monitoring and compensation occur continuously during the ready segment without interrupting the overall dispensing workflow. The control cycles operate in parallel with the normal pump operation, maintaining pressure stability while preparing for dispense, thereby minimizing additional time expenditure while ensuring dispensing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively maintains consistent pressure, preventing damage to chemicals, ensuring accurate and repeatable dispensing, and reducing waste by minimizing pressure spikes and fluid dynamics issues, thus enhancing the efficiency and reliability of the dispensing process.

Implementation Method 1

based on a pressure sensed in the dispense chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 2

the movement of the pumping means regulated to maintain substantially the desired pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure-compensated motor control:

Data Source

PatentUS9816502B2System and method for pressure compensation in a pump
Publication Date: 2017.11.14 ENTEGRIS INC
  • US9816502B2 patent drawing
  • US9816502B2 patent drawing
  • US9816502B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for maintaining substantially a baseline pressure in a chamber of a pumping apparatus are disclosed. Embodiments of the present invention may serve to control a motor to compensate or account for a pressure drift which may occur in a chamber of the pumping apparatus. More specifically, a dispense motor may be controlled to substantially maintain a baseline pressure in the dispense chamber before a dispense based on a pressure sensed in the dispense chamber. In one embodiment, before a dispense is initiated a control loop may be utilized such that it is repeatedly determined if the pressure in the dispense chamber is above a desired pressure and, if so, the movement of the pumping means regulated to maintain substantially the desired pressure in the dispense chamber until a dispense of fluid is initiated.