Centrifugal Pump Protection Without Traditional Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pump protection systems for centrifugal pumps rely on traditional sensors, which add cost and complexity, and fail to differentiate between dangerous operating conditions like dry running, minimum flow, and runout, limiting their flexibility and accuracy across varying speeds.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates a flow value using field-calibrated speed vs. closed valve power curves and motor signals, allowing for comparison to threshold values to identify and respond to undesirable operating conditions without traditional sensors, embedded in a Variable Frequency Drive or Programmable Logic Controller.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional sensors are used for pump protection, then pump protection reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump protection reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pump protection system uses the motor drive's existing sensors and control capabilities to self-diagnose pump operating conditions. The system calculates pump flow, head, and power by processing motor current, voltage, and frequency data already available from the drive, eliminating the need for external flow meters, pressure sensors, or power meters. This self-service approach maintains protection reliability while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The motor drive is made multi-functional by enabling it to perform both motor control and pump protection functions. The drive's existing current and voltage sensors are used for both torque control and pump condition monitoring. The control algorithm provides multiple protection functions (dry run detection, minimum flow detection, runout detection) using a single integrated system, reducing the need for dedicated protection devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If traditional sensors are used for pump protection, then measurement precision is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating condition detection precisionVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Physical sensors (flow meters, pressure transducers, power meters) are replaced with a computational system that calculates pump parameters from electrical measurements. The system substitutes mechanical measurement devices with algorithm-based calculations using motor electrical data, reducing cost while maintaining measurement precision through mathematical modeling of pump characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor drive acts as an intermediary between the power source and pump, providing both control and monitoring functions. Rather than adding separate sensors to the pump system, the drive serves as a central intermediary that processes electrical data to infer pump operating conditions, reducing the need for additional measurement devices and associated costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If constant protection thresholds are used, then simplicity is improved, but adaptability across varying speeds deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesimplicityVSAvoidadaptability across speed ranges
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The protection thresholds are made dynamic by calculating them based on the motor's operating speed and frequency. The system determines speed-dependent thresholds for pump flow, head, and power by referencing stored pump performance curves and adjusting them according to actual operating conditions. This dynamic approach maintains simplicity of implementation while achieving adaptability across varying speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The protection parameters (flow threshold, head threshold, power threshold) are changed dynamically based on operating speed. Rather than using fixed thresholds, the system adjusts these parameters according to the pump's performance characteristics at different speeds, maintaining protection effectiveness across the full operating range while preserving ease of operation through automated parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If pump protection differentiates between operating conditions, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection accuracyVSAvoidcontrol logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pump operating conditions are segmented into distinct categories (dry run, minimum flow, runout, normal operation) with specific detection criteria for each. The control algorithm evaluates multiple parameters (power, flow, head) and compares them against condition-specific thresholds to identify and respond to different undesirable conditions appropriately, improving protection accuracy while organizing complexity into manageable segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8303260B2Method and apparatus for pump protection without the use of traditional sensors
Publication Date: 2012.11.06 ITT GOULDS PUMPS INC
  • US8303260B2 patent drawing
  • US8303260B2 patent drawing
  • US8303260B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides protection for centrifugal pumps while differentiating between dangerous operating conditions (e.g. dry running, minimum flow and runout) and/or conditions where transient conditions (e.g. closed valve operation) may occur and the protection can be revoked once the condition clears. The methodology utilizes a calculated flow value which can be mathematically determined from a calibrated closed valve power vs speed curve and/or various pump and motor parameters such as speed, torque, power and/or differential pressure or from calibrated flow curves stored in the evaluation device. The calculated flow value is then compared to threshold values of flow associated with these adverse operating conditions.