Pump Start Process for Urea Solution Temperature Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for starting pumps that handle aqueous urea solutions, used in SCR processes for reducing NOx emissions, face challenges in determining optimal actuation time, leading to potential pump damage or suboptimal pollution control due to under or overestimation of starting time, especially in varying temperature conditions.

Innovation Solution

A process that determines the temperature of the liquid in the tank and compares it to a setpoint temperature, heating the tank if necessary, and then actuates the pump to maintain a stable outlet pressure, using a controller and heating elements to ensure safe and efficient operation, particularly for eutectic water/urea solutions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the pump actuation time is underestimated to enable faster operation, then productivity is improved, but the pump may be damaged due to insufficient melting time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump actuation speedVSAvoidpump damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary heating of the urea solution tank before pump actuation. The control unit activates heating elements to raise the solution temperature above its freezing point, ensuring the solution is in liquid state before the pump starts operating, thus preventing damage from pumping crystallized material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses temperature sensors to continuously monitor the urea solution temperature and provides feedback to the control unit. Based on this feedback, the control unit adjusts the heating duration and intensity, and determines the optimal pump start time, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to actual thermal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the pump actuation time is overestimated to ensure safe operation, then reliability is improved, but the system performance deteriorates due to delayed operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump safe operationVSAvoidsystem response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the pump actuation timing based on real-time temperature measurements and thermal model calculations. Rather than using fixed conservative delays, the control unit computes the precise moment when sufficient liquid has melted, allowing the pump to start as early as safely possible, optimizing both reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters (heating power, heating duration, pump start time) based on the measured initial temperature of the urea solution. The control unit uses thermal data to calculate required heating time and adjusts the actuation schedule dynamically, allowing faster operation when temperatures are already favorable while maintaining safety margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If experimental data from cold room tests is used to determine actuation time, then measurement precision is improved, but the results do not account for practical variability such as wind and vibrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation time measurementVSAvoidapplicability to real conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates safety margins and robustness factors into the thermal model predictions. The control unit adds time buffers and temperature thresholds that account for unexpected variations in real-world conditions (wind, vibrations, thermal losses), cushioning against the differences between controlled test environments and actual operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own operational sensors and control mechanisms to adapt to real conditions during actual use. Rather than relying solely on pre-characterized experimental data, the system continuously monitors actual thermal response and adjusts future actuation decisions based on observed performance, allowing it to self-calibrate to its specific installation environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If thermodynamic and thermal data calculations are used to determine actuation time, then device complexity is reduced, but the results do not account for practical parameters of variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation method simplicityVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an empirical thermal model as an intermediary between simple thermodynamic calculations and complex real-world behavior. This model incorporates experimentally determined heat transfer coefficients and thermal capacitances that capture practical effects (convection, radiation, conduction variations) without requiring full computational complexity, bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process optimizes the pump starting time, preventing damage and ensuring optimal system performance by maintaining stable pressure within acceptable margins, even in low-temperature conditions, thereby enhancing the reliability and efficiency of the SCR system.

Implementation Method 1

a heating device to liquefy the solution... the tank is heated for a time t1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

the pump is actuated for a time t2 during which the pump outlet pressure is measured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPumping: Pump

Implementation Method 3

injected into the exhaust gas stream where it is hydrolysed before converting the nitrogen oxide (NOx) to nitrogen (N2) and water (H2O)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Data Source

PatentEP2158382B1Process for starting a pump
Publication Date: 2016.08.10 PLASTIC OMNIUM ADVANCED INNOVATION & RES SA
  • EP2158382B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2158382B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Process for starting a pump intended to pump a liquid contained in a tank and to produce a substantially constant outlet pressure (setpoint pressure), according to which: 1. the temperature (T1) of the liquid held in the tank is determined and compared to a setpoint temperature (T0); 2. if the temperature (T1) is greater than the setpoint temperature (T0), the pump is actuated; 3. if the temperature (T1) is less than or equal to the setpoint temperature (T0), the tank is heated for a time tl; then 4. the pump is actuated for a time t2 during which the pump outlet pressure is measured; 5. if this pressure is stable and in an acceptable margin of the setpoint pressure, the pump is kept going; 6. if this pressure is not stable and/or is not in the acceptable margin of the setpoint pressure, the pump is stopped and the tank is heated for a time t3, at the end of which steps 4 to 6 are repeated.