Pumping Liner Flow Control for Faster Semiconductor Chamber Cleaning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional semiconductor processing chamber cleaning methods, particularly in-situ cleaning, are inefficient in cleaning chamber components downstream of the processing volume, leading to prolonged cleaning cycles and reduced production throughput.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an ex-situ cleaning method using a bypass gas inlet in a pumping liner, combined with a flow control mechanism, allows for concurrent in-situ and ex-situ cleaning, ensuring efficient and uniform cleaning of the entire processing chamber by regulating the flow of cleaning gases through the chamber's internal volumes and apertures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional in-situ cleaning methods are used, then the processing volume is cleaned, but the downstream chamber components are not effectively cleaned and cleaning time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning uniformityVSAvoidcleaning cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The pumping liner is divided into multiple aperture zones (first plurality and second plurality of apertures) that can be independently controlled. This segmentation allows different regions of the chamber to be cleaned simultaneously through separate gas flow paths, improving both cleaning uniformity and reducing overall cleaning time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A bypass gas inlet is introduced as an intermediary component that allows cleaning gas to flow directly into the pumping liner's internal volume. This bypass path enables downstream chamber components to be cleaned concurrently with the processing volume, eliminating the sequential cleaning limitation of conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a bypass gas inlet and flow control mechanism are added, then concurrent in-situ and ex-situ cleaning is enabled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction throughputVSAvoidchamber structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pumping liner is designed to serve multiple functions: it acts as both a vacuum pumping interface and a cleaning gas distribution manifold. The existing aperture structure is repurposed to enable dual flow paths (process gas and cleaning gas), avoiding the need for separate cleaning mechanisms and reducing overall system complexity despite added functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Flow control mechanisms (valves or flow controllers) are implemented to dynamically regulate gas flow distribution between different aperture zones. This dynamic control allows flexible operation modes including concurrent cleaning, sequential cleaning, or process operation, enabling the system to adapt to different production requirements while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces cleaning time, improves production throughput, and ensures uniform cleaning of all chamber components, including those downstream of the processing volume, compared to traditional in-situ methods.

Implementation Method 1

The flow control mechanism may be operable to direct fluid flow into the internal volume via the gas inlet and then into the processing volume via a subset of the plurality of apertures of the pumping liner during fluid distribution into the processing volume from the gas distribution member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 2

The pumping liner may define a plurality of apertures circumferentially disposed about the processing volume and an internal volume that may be in fluid communication with the processing volume via the plurality of apertures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid communication:

Implementation Method 3

The flow control mechanism may be operable to create a pressure differential between a pressure inside a first duct coupling a first gas outlet to an exhaust and a pressure inside a second duct coupling a second gas outlet to the exhaust

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11952660B2Semiconductor processing chambers and methods for cleaning the same
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US11952660B2 patent drawing
  • US11952660B2 patent drawing
  • US11952660B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A processing chamber may include a gas distribution member, a substrate support, and a pumping liner. The gas distribution member and the substrate support may at least in part define a processing volume. The pumping liner may define an internal volume in fluid communication with the processing volume via a plurality of apertures of the pumping liner circumferentially disposed about the processing volume. The processing chamber may further include a flow control mechanism operable to direct fluid flow from the internal volume of the pumping liner into the processing volume via a subset of the plurality of apertures of the pumping liner during fluid distribution into the processing volume from the gas distribution member.