Flatbed Punching Machine Pressing Force Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flatbed die-cutting and embossing machines require time-consuming and error-prone adjustments of pressing force, which hampers efficiency and increases waste during job changes.

Innovation Solution

A method to adjust the pressing force by using job-dependent tool data and specific force data from a database to calculate a setpoint force, allowing for precise control of the pressing force through an adjusting device, with the option to correct after the first punching process and save settings for repeat orders.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the pressing force is adjusted manually by moving wedge-shaped steel plates, then the punching force can be optimized, but the adjustment process becomes very time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepunching force optimizationVSAvoidadjustment process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores the optimal pressing force values in a database based on tool type, material properties, and process parameters. When a punching operation is initiated, the system automatically retrieves the pre-determined optimal pressing force from the database and applies it, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual adjustment while ensuring manufacturing precision is maintained

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical adjustment system (wedge-shaped steel plates requiring physical movement and operator intervention) with an automated control system that uses stored data and automatic calculation to determine and apply the optimal pressing force, significantly reducing adjustment time while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If the pressing force is adjusted manually, then the optimum force can be approached, but the process is error-prone and requires gradual approximation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepunching force optimizationVSAvoidadjustment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual pressing force is measured and compared against the target value calculated from tool data and material properties. The system automatically adjusts the pressing force based on this feedback, ensuring high reliability and eliminating the errors inherent in manual gradual approximation methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically retrieving tool data, calculating the optimal pressing force, and applying the correct force without requiring operator intervention or gradual approximation, thereby eliminating human error and improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment is used, then the punching force can be optimized, but the setup time for job changes increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepunching force optimizationVSAvoidmachine output
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores optimal pressing force values for different tool types, materials, and process conditions in a database. When a job change occurs, the system automatically retrieves the pre-calculated optimal pressing force from the database based on the new job parameters, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual adjustment and maintaining productivity during job changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic adjustment system that automatically adapts the pressing force based on real-time job parameters, tool data, and material properties. This dynamic system allows rapid reconfiguration for different jobs without the setup time penalties of manual adjustment, maintaining both precision and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2754541B1Method for adjusting the pressing force a punching and embossing machine
Publication Date: 2018.05.30 MASTERWORK GROUP CO LTD
  • EP2754541B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2754541B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The method involves providing tool data, which describes an individual structure of a cutting tool (30) including cutting and grooving tools, rubber linings, and round embossing stereotypes. Specific force data is read from a workflow connection (26). A specific pressing force is assigned to the cutting and grooving tools, the linings and stereotypes by the specific force data. A target-pressing force is calculated from the tool data and the specific force data. A pressing force (F) of a flatbed cutting and/or embossing machine (100) is adjusted to the target-pressing force. An independent claim is also included for a flatbed cutting and/or embossing machine.