Automated Purchase Order Aggregation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Companies face difficulties in efficiently aggregating purchasing requirements across multiple departments and suppliers to take advantage of discounts and optimize purchase orders, due to cumbersome manual processes and the complexity of understanding supplier incentives and past performance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for optimizing purchase orders by aggregating purchasing requirements, identifying potential suppliers, and applying optimization rules to maximize discounts and benefits, while considering supplier performance and contract terms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual processes are used to aggregate purchasing requirements and negotiate with suppliers, then flexibility in decision-making is maintained, but the time and administrative effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of aggregating purchasing requirementsVSAvoidtime for collecting purchasing requests
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes with an automated computer-based system that collects purchasing requests from multiple departments, aggregates them by item, and generates purchase orders automatically. This substitution eliminates the time-consuming manual collection and aggregation tasks while maintaining the purchasing workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing departments to automatically submit their purchasing requests through the computer system, which then automatically aggregates these requests and generates purchase orders without requiring manual intervention from purchasing agents for data collection and consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Quantity of substance

If purchasing requirements from multiple departments are aggregated into single purchase orders, then bulk discounts from suppliers can be obtained, but the complexity of managing and coordinating these aggregated orders increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of items purchasedVSAvoidcomplexity of purchase order management
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the purchasing process into distinct automated steps: collection of individual departmental requests, aggregation by item type, generation of consolidated purchase orders, and tracking of supplier performance. This segmentation manages complexity by automating each step rather than requiring manual coordination of the entire process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The computer-based purchasing agent performs multiple functions automatically: it collects requests from various departments, aggregates them by item, negotiates with multiple suppliers, and generates purchase orders. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate manual processes into a single automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If multiple suppliers are evaluated based on past performance and contract terms, then the quality and reliability of purchases improve, but the time and resources required for evaluation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of supplier performanceVSAvoidtime for evaluating suppliers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of suppliers by automatically retrieving and analyzing their past performance data and contract terms before generating purchase orders. This preliminary action ensures that only qualified suppliers are considered, improving reliability while reducing the time required during the actual purchasing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where supplier performance is tracked and evaluated based on past deliveries and contract compliance. This feedback information is automatically fed into the supplier selection process, enabling the system to learn from past performance and make more reliable supplier choices over time without increasing evaluation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7475029B2Computer implemented methods and computer readable mediums for optimizing a purchase order
Publication Date: 2009.01.06 SAP SE
  • US7475029B2 patent drawing
  • US7475029B2 patent drawing
  • US7475029B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a system and method for optimizing a purchase order. While generating a purchase order, a purchasing agent may aggregate a company's purchasing requirements into a single purchase order, receive notification of a supplier's offers for discounts to determine whether it would be advantageous to modify a purchase request, or view evaluations of a supplier's past performance. Upon receipt of a purchase request, potential suppliers are identified to fulfill the request. A purchasing agent may then see whether a purchase request may be aggregated with other purchase requests or whether conditions are present that may trigger other opportunities to optimize the purchase order. As a result, a purchase order is generated that has been optimized to reduce costs as well as take advantage of other benefits that the purchaser may be interested in.