Purchase Order Budget Allocation Across Time Periods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retail businesses face challenges in managing purchase orders due to varying lead times, which can result in unnecessary capital being tied up by committing funds too early, as existing systems lack the ability to flexibly and automatically allocate budgets across multiple products, order periods, and delivery periods.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for budgeting purchase orders that involves defining a purchasing budget for a delivery period and allocating it into multiple buckets, which are then distributed across associated order periods, allowing for flexible allocation and ensuring budget availability in later periods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If purchase orders are placed early to satisfy all lead times, then delivery requirements are met, but unnecessary amounts of business capital are tied up

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery requirement satisfactionVSAvoidcapital tie-up
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the total purchase order into multiple partial purchase orders, each corresponding to different order periods. This segmentation allows the business to allocate budget across multiple time periods rather than committing all funds upfront, thereby reducing capital tie-up while still meeting delivery requirements through coordinated partial orders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If purchase orders are placed in advance of required delivery period, then lead time requirements are satisfied, but budget flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelead time satisfactionVSAvoidbudget flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic budget allocation system where the budget is divided into multiple buckets corresponding to different order periods. This dynamic structure allows the business to adjust spending across time periods based on actual needs and changing conditions, maintaining budget flexibility while ensuring lead time requirements are met through appropriate period allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If purchase orders are split and allocated to multiple order periods, then capital efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapital efficiencyVSAvoidorder allocation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a time dimension to the purchase order system by creating multiple order periods and associated budget buckets. This dimensional expansion allows the system to track and allocate funds across time while maintaining clear relationships between delivery periods and order periods, managing complexity through structured temporal organization rather than ad hoc arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8423428B2Method for allocation of budget to order periods and delivery periods in a purchase order system
Publication Date: 2013.04.16 SAP SE
  • US8423428B2 patent drawing
  • US8423428B2 patent drawing
  • US8423428B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of processing a purchase order is disclosed. The method includes receiving an electronic purchase order in a current one of a plurality of order periods for a designated delivery period, accessing a budget allocation corresponding to said delivery period, and providing an acceptance or a rejection of the electronic purchase order based at least partially on a budget portion of the current order period. The budget allocation includes a budget portion corresponding to each of the plurality of order periods.