Multi-Layer Purchase Verification for Real-Time Fraud Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face difficulties in providing real-time multi-layer identification, verification, and fraud protection, especially in determining and verifying a person's identity and physical location across various circumstances, with challenges in facial recognition, biometric identification, location tracking, proximity detection, geofencing, pattern recognition, event recording, and access to law enforcement records.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for real-time multi-layer identification, verification, and fraud protection that uses artificial intelligence and blockchains to provide comprehensive identification, tracking, and verification information, adaptable across different situations, with purchasing risk assessment for both merchants and purchasers, and feedback and adaptive learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multi-layer security verification is implemented, then identification accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system is divided into multiple independent layers including biometric verification, location verification, device verification, and behavioral analysis. Each layer operates independently and contributes to the overall verification decision, allowing the system to achieve high accuracy without requiring a single complex verification mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a unified verification framework that handles multiple verification types (biometric, location, device, behavioral) through a common architecture. This multi-functional approach allows the same system structure to perform diverse verification tasks, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Speed

If real-time verification is implemented, then response speed is improved, but computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification checks using lightweight algorithms before initiating more computationally intensive verification processes. For example, basic device authentication and location checks are performed first, and only if these pass does the system proceed to more resource-intensive biometric and behavioral analyses, thereby reducing overall computational burden while maintaining real-time response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the depth of verification based on risk assessment. For low-risk transactions, only essential verification layers are activated, consuming fewer computational resources. For high-risk scenarios, the system activates additional verification layers, ensuring security without unnecessarily consuming resources in all cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If comprehensive data collection is implemented, then verification reliability is improved, but data privacy risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoiddata privacy risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects and processes different types of data with different levels of sensitivity and protection requirements. Biometric data is handled with the highest security measures, while less sensitive data like device identifiers receives standard protection. This differentiated approach allows comprehensive data collection for reliable verification while minimizing privacy risks through targeted protection strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces privacy-preserving intermediaries such as cryptographic protocols and trusted execution environments that allow verification processing without exposing raw personal data. These intermediaries enable the system to derive verification insights from comprehensive data collection while preventing direct access to sensitive information, thereby reducing privacy risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250342477A1Method and system for a real-time multi-layer identification, verification and fraud protection purchashing system
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 DEBELLIS REGINA
  • US20250342477A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342477A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342477A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Multi-layer security permissions and multi-layer security functionality is provided for a purchasing system. A purchasing risk assessment is determined for both a merchant and a purchaser and verified in real-time as a purchaser makes a purchase with a merchant at a merchant site including a physical location or online. Summary identification, verification, tracking and location information and comprehensive identification, verification and location information is provided in real-time for both the purchaser and merchant. Feedback and adaptive learning with artificial intelligence (AI) and using blockchains and other methods provide comprehensive identification, tracking and verification information, adaptable across various different situations and circumstances for purchasers and merchants at merchant sites.