Purge System Abnormality Detection Using Two-Stage Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing abnormality determination methods for purge systems increase power consumption during diagnostic processes, which is inefficient.

Innovation Solution

The method involves estimating diagnosis parameters by closing the outside air shutoff valve in two stages, with different threshold values to determine the presence of abnormalities in the vapor and purge passages, allowing for reduced power consumption when no abnormalities are detected and increased accuracy when abnormalities are confirmed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the output of the purge pump is increased to improve abnormality detection accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The abnormality determination process is divided into two distinct stages: a first determination using a first threshold value, and a second determination using a second threshold value. This segmentation allows the system to perform a preliminary check with lower energy consumption, and only escalate to high-power mode when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using a first, lower threshold value for initial abnormality screening. Only when this preliminary determination indicates a possible abnormality does the system proceed to the second determination with the higher threshold value and increased pump output, thus avoiding excessive power consumption during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Use of energy by moving object

If a two-stage determination process is implemented to reduce power consumption, then use of energy is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoiddetermination process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The determination process is segmented into two stages with different threshold values. The first stage uses a first threshold for preliminary screening, and the second stage uses a second threshold for confirmation. This segmentation reduces overall energy consumption while maintaining manageable complexity through a structured, stepwise approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial determination in the first stage using only the first threshold value and normal pump output. This partial action allows the system to avoid the full complexity and power consumption of a complete determination process during normal operation, reducing energy use while keeping the system design relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240280069A1Abnormality determination method for purge system and abnormality determination system for purge system
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20240280069A1 patent drawing
  • US20240280069A1 patent drawing
  • US20240280069A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An method for determining an abnormality in a passage of a purge system includes: closing an outside air shutoff valve in a state where an output of a purge pump is set to be a high output upon determining that there is a possibility of an abnormality in the passage based on a first diagnosis parameter estimated by closing the outside air shutoff valve in a state where the purge pump is driven; at that time, estimating a second diagnosis parameter that is allowed to be classified into a third region in which it is determined that there is no abnormality in the passage and a fourth region in which it is determined that there is an abnormality in the passage, with a second threshold value as a boundary; and determining that there is an abnormality in the passage when the second diagnosis parameter is included in the fourth region.