PUSCH Transport Block Sizing with OCC-Based Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for improved methods to determine transport block sizes in uplink transmissions for wireless communication systems, particularly in 5G NR, to enhance data rate, latency, and reliability, especially for diverse use cases like eMBB, mMTC, and URLLC.

Innovation Solution

A user equipment (UE) is equipped with computer-executable instructions to determine the transport block size for a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) transmission by considering factors such as the application of Orthogonal Cover Code (OCC), spreading factor, and modulation-and-coding-scheme (MCS), using a scaling factor based on these conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed transport block size determination method is used, then the method is simple to implement, but it cannot optimize for different use cases (eMBB, mMTC, URLLC) and achieves poor data rate and reliability performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different use casesVSAvoidcomplexity of TBS determination method
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic transport block size determination by introducing a scaling factor that adapts the TBS based on the actual number of allocated resource elements. The method dynamically adjusts the TBS according to real-time channel conditions and resource allocation, transitioning from a fixed determination method to a dynamic one that optimizes performance for different use cases including eMBB, mMTC, and URLLC.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of transport block size by introducing a scaling factor that modifies the determined TBS based on the ratio of actual to expected resource elements. This parameter change allows the system to adapt the TBS to different channel conditions and resource allocation scenarios, improving data rate and reliability while maintaining implementation simplicity through a straightforward scaling operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the transport block size is increased to improve data rate, then data transmission speed improves, but transmission reliability decreases due to higher error rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission rateVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the balance between data rate and reliability by dynamically adjusting the transport block size parameter based on the scaling factor. The scaling factor, which is determined by the ratio of actual to expected resource elements, allows the system to increase TBS when channel conditions are good (improving data rate) while decreasing TBS when channel conditions deteriorate (maintaining reliability), thus achieving adaptive optimization of both parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the transport block size is decreased to improve reliability, then transmission reliability improves, but data transmission efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prevents the system from unnecessarily decreasing the transport block size by introducing a scaling mechanism that maintains TBS at optimal levels. The scaling factor ensures that even when resource elements are reduced, the TBS is adjusted proportionally to maintain efficient data transmission, avoiding excessive TBS reduction that would harm productivity while still improving reliability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If OCC is applied to PUSCH transmission to improve reliability, then transmission reliability improves, but the complexity of determining transport block size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoidcomplexity of TBS determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent handles the OCC complexity by incorporating it into the existing resource element allocation framework. The scaling factor method naturally accounts for OCC overhead by using the actual number of allocated resource elements, which already reflects the impact of OCC application. This approach integrates OCC considerations into the TBS determination without adding separate complex calculation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250227689A1Transport block size determination in communication networks
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 SHARP KK
  • US20250227689A1 patent drawing
  • US20250227689A1 patent drawing
  • US20250227689A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A user equipment (UE) that includes one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing one or more computer-executable instructions for determining the transport block size for a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) transmission and at least one processor coupled to the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media is provided. The processor is configured to execute the one or more computer-executable instructions to cause the UE to determine whether an Orthogonal Cover Code (OCC) is applied to the PUSCH transmission; determine a spreading factor of the OCC in a case that the OCC is applied to the PUSCH transmission; determine whether a condition is satisfied for determining the transport block size; and determine the transport block size using a scaling factor in a case the condition is satisfied, the scaling factor being determined based on the spreading factor.