Push-Button Latch Mechanism for Hot-Swappable Electronic Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing latch mechanisms for securing expansion cards in computer systems occupy valuable space without enhancing capacity or performance, and require shutdown for installation or removal.

Innovation Solution

A latch mechanism comprising a frame with a spring latch and ejection lever, actuated by a push button, which allows for secure installation and easy ejection of electronic modules without moving parts on the module, utilizing a spring latch and ejection lever mechanism that minimizes space usage and allows for hot swapping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional latch mechanisms are used to secure expansion cards, then the cards can be secured during operation, but valuable space is occupied without adding capacity or performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring of expansion cardVSAvoidspace occupied by latch mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The latch mechanism is merged with the frame structure itself. The latch arm is formed as an integrated component of the frame, eliminating the need for separate latch mechanisms that would occupy additional space. The frame's structural elements are combined with the securing function, so the same space serves both structural support and card retention purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure serves multiple functions: it provides structural support, defines the bay geometry, and incorporates the latch mechanism for card retention. The actuator also serves dual purposes by both releasing the latch and potentially ejecting the card. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated space for separate securing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If expansion cards are made hot swappable for continuous operation, then system uptime is improved, but the latch mechanism becomes more complex to enable secure installation and removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem uptimeVSAvoidlatch mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latch mechanism is segmented into distinct functional components: a latch arm with engagement feature, a separate actuator mechanism, and a spring biasing system. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall operation - the actuator only needs to move linearly to release the latch, while the latch arm handles the engagement and ejection functions separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring the card to have moving parts for release, the invention inverts the approach by placing all moving parts on the frame side. The card remains passive with fixed connectors, while the frame contains the actuator and latch arm that perform all active operations. This inversion simplifies the card design and makes hot-swapping easier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Area of stationary object

If latch mechanisms are integrated into the frame to minimize space, then space efficiency is improved, but the mechanism must be compact which may limit ease of operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace used by latch mechanismVSAvoidactuator accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator is positioned to operate in a dimension perpendicular to the card insertion/removal direction. The actuator moves linearly along the frame's length, while the latch arm pivots in a different plane. This dimensional separation allows the actuator to be accessible from the front of the bay without interfering with the compact lateral arrangement of the latch components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables secure and efficient installation and removal of electronic modules without occupying additional space, allowing for continuous system operation and reducing physical constraints on module design.

Implementation Method 1

A spring latch is secured to the frame and biased to extend a latch key into the bay to engage and latch the electronic module

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

an ejection lever includes a first end outside of the bay, a second end inside the bay, and a middle portion between the first and second ends that is pivotally secured to one side of the bay

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Data Source

PatentUS9063705B2Latch mechanism for securing an electronic module
Publication Date: 2015.06.23 LENOVO GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US9063705B2 patent drawing
  • US9063705B2 patent drawing
  • US9063705B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes a frame forming a bay for receiving an electronic module having a blind mate connector for coupling with a chassis connector. An actuator is slidably secured to the frame and forms a push button, an intermediate actuation member, and a distal actuation member. A spring latch is biased to latch the module in place. An ejection lever is pivotally secured to one side of the bay, and has a first end aligned with the distal actuation member and a second end disposed to engage the module. Pushing the push button causes the intermediate actuation member to withdraw the spring latch from the bay and then causes the distal actuation member to pivot the ejection lever to unseat and eject the module.