Push-Button Shifter Redundant Switch State Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional shift-by-wire transmission systems face challenges in accurately determining the state of push-buttons without mechanical linkages, leading to potential errors in transmission range selection due to rare switch closure patterns or transient electrical faults.

Innovation Solution

A push-button shifter assembly with redundant switches and a controller that determines the 'pressed', 'released', or 'unknown' state of each button by monitoring the temporal coincidence of switch closures and openings within calibrated intervals, using analog-to-digital converters to process switch signals and execute control actions based on determined states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple redundant switches are used in each push-button, then reliability of button state determination is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebutton state determination reliabilityVSAvoidswitch assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors the state of multiple redundant switches and uses feedback logic to determine the actual button state. The system evaluates whether switches closed within a calibrated time interval and adjusts the determined state based on this feedback, resolving contradictions between using fewer switches and maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of time by introducing a calibrated time interval threshold. This allows the controller to distinguish between legitimate simultaneous switch closures (indicating a pressed state) and sequential closures (indicating potential faults), thereby maintaining reliability without requiring all redundant switches to be identical in behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If all redundant switches must close simultaneously to indicate a pressed state, then measurement precision is improved, but reliability decreases due to transient electrical faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebutton press detection precisionVSAvoidsystem operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system prepares for potential switch failures by having multiple redundant switches and pre-programmed fault tolerance logic. When one switch fails to close due to a transient fault, the remaining switches provide a cushion that allows the system to still correctly identify the pressed state through temporal correlation analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system accepts that not all redundant switches need to close perfectly simultaneously. By requiring only a majority or plausible temporal correlation of switch closures within a calibrated interval, the system uses partial action (not all switches must succeed) while still achieving reliable detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If a calibrated time interval is used to determine simultaneous switch closure, then button state determination accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch closure timing accuracyVSAvoidbutton state determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously and periodically samples the state of all redundant switches at high frequency. This periodic monitoring allows the system to detect switch closures and their temporal relationships rapidly, minimizing the time penalty associated with using a calibrated interval for accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9599216B2Push-button shifter assembly with button state determination logic
Publication Date: 2017.03.21 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US9599216B2 patent drawing
  • US9599216B2 patent drawing
  • US9599216B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle or other system includes an actuator assembly operable to achieve a selected operating state of the system in response to an electronic state selection signal, a push-button shifter assembly, and a controller. The shift assembly includes push-buttons, each including at least three redundant switches. A binary open/closed state of each switch defines the electronic state selection signal. The controller is in by-wire communication with the actuator and push-button shifter assemblies, and receives the electronic state selection signal. The controller determines a pressed, released, or unknown button state of each push-button by determining, in response to the electronic state selection signal, if all of the redundant switches have closed. If all of the redundant switches have not closed, the controller determines whether fewer than all of the switches have closed and opened within a calibrated time interval of each other.