Airborne Component Extractor With Push-Pull Hood Airflow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fume extraction systems are limited in their ability to effectively draw and remove fumes and smoke from metal working workspaces over a wide area, with a need for improved suction capacity and increased distance and volume of extraction.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a fume extraction system that combines positive airflow with suction airflow, utilizing a hood design with an annular space between outer and inner shrouds to create a radial outflow of air, along with adjustable flow rates and electronic control systems to optimize the extraction of airborne components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If conventional suction-only systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the extraction distance and effective volume are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction volumeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines positive airflow (pushing) with negative airflow (suction) into a unified extraction system. The hood integrates both a positive pressure air source and a negative pressure air source, creating a synergistic effect where the positive airflow directs contaminants toward the hood while the negative pressure draws them in, thereby expanding the effective extraction volume and distance without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a radial outflow component through the annular space between inner and outer shrouds, adding a dimensional element to the traditional linear suction approach. This radial configuration creates a three-dimensional airflow pattern that expands the extraction coverage area and effective volume beyond what conventional linear suction systems can achieve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If suction airflow alone is used, then the system is easy to operate, but the capture ability over large area and distance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture abilityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges positive airflow generation (through fans or blowers positioned near the workspace) with negative airflow generation (through the hood suction system) to create a coordinated capture mechanism. The positive airflow actively pushes contaminants toward the hood while the negative pressure simultaneously draws them in, significantly enhancing capture ability over large areas and distances. The integrated control system manages both airflow sources together, maintaining operational simplicity despite the enhanced functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If fixed extraction systems are used, then the extraction effectiveness at specific locations is high, but the adaptability to different work areas is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework area coverageVSAvoidextraction effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs variable speed motors controlling both the positive and negative pressure air sources, allowing dynamic adjustment of airflow rates to match different workspace configurations, contaminant types, and operational requirements. This dynamic control capability enables the system to adapt to various work areas while maintaining reliable extraction effectiveness through real-time optimization of airflow parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes adjustable airflow parameters (volume, velocity, distribution pattern) through variable speed motors and controllable fans/blowers. By changing these parameters based on specific application requirements, the system can effectively cover different work areas and maintain extraction reliability across diverse operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the capture of airborne components such as smoke, fumes, and particulate matter over a larger area and at greater distances, providing a more efficient and flexible extraction system compared to conventional methods.

Implementation Method 1

a source of a positive pressure air stream and a source of a negative pressure air stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPositive pressure airflow: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

the negative pressure air stream to be drawn from the work area to pull airborne components away from the work area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 3

hood design with an annular space between outer and inner shrouds to create a radial outflow of air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial outflow: Flow Separation

Data Source

PatentUS9505041B2Optimized airborne component extractor
Publication Date: 2016.11.29 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US9505041B2 patent drawing
  • US9505041B2 patent drawing
  • US9505041B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A component extractor system includes a source of a positive pressure air stream and a source of a negative pressure air stream. Conduits convey the air streams to and from a work area where one or more nozzles create a capture region and draw airborne components into the system. The system is optimized in terms of flow ratios, dimensions of the conduits and elements of the nozzle, and so forth.